The Commercial Appeal

Tax bills for rich near 34-year high

- By Stephen Ohlemacher

WASHINGTON — The poor rich.

With Washington gridlocked again over whether to raise their taxes, it turns out wealthy families already are paying some of their biggest federal tax bills in decades even as the rest of the population continues to pay at historical­ly low rates.

President Barack Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress say the wealthy must pay their fair share if the federal government is ever going to fix its finances and reduce the budget deficit to a manageable level.

A new analysis, however, shows that average tax bills for high-income families rarely have been higher since the Congres- sional Budget Office began tracking the data in 1979. Middle- and low-income families aren’t paying as much as they used to.

For 2013, families with incomes in the top 20 percent of the nation will pay an average of 27.2 percent of their income in federal taxes, according to projection­s by the Tax Policy Center, a research organizati­on based in Washington. The top 1 percent of households, those with incomes averaging $1.4 million, will pay an average of 35.5 percent.

Those tax rates, which include income, payroll, corporate and estate taxes, are among the highest since 1979.

The average family in the bottom 20 percent of

households won’t pay any federal taxes. Instead, many families in this group will get payments from the federal government by claiming more in credits than they owe in taxes, including payroll taxes. That will give them a negative tax rate.

The middle 20 percent of U. S. households — those making an average of $46,600 — will pay an average of 13.8 percent of their income in federal taxes for this year, according to the Tax Policy Center. Over the past three decades, the average federal tax rate for this group has been about 16 percent.

“My sense is that highincome people feel abused by being targeted always for more taxes,” Roberton Williams, a fellow at the Tax Policy Center, said.

Last week, Senate Democrats were unable to advance their proposal to raise taxes on some wealthy families for the second time this year as part of a package to avoid automatic spending cuts. The bill failed Thursday when Republican­s blocked it. A competing Republican bill that included no tax increases also failed, and the automatic spending cuts began taking effect Friday.

The issue, however, isn’t going away.

Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress insist that any future deal to reduce government borrowing must include a mix of spending cuts and more tax revenue.

“I am prepared to do hard things and to push my Democratic friends to do hard things,” Obama said Friday. “But what I can’t do is ask middle-class families, ask seniors, ask students to bear the entire burden of deficit reduction when we know we’ve got a bunch of tax loopholes that are benefiting the well-off and the well-connected, aren’t contributi­ng to growth, aren’t contributi­ng to our economy. It’s not fair. It’s not right.”

On Sunday, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said Republican­s are committed to reducing the budget deficit without raising taxes again. In a separate broadcast interview, White House economic adviser Gene Sperling called that position unreasonab­le.

The Democrats’ sequester bill included the “Buf- fett Rule,” named after billionair­e investor Warren Buffett. It gradually would phase in a requiremen­t that people making more than $1 million a year pay at least 30 percent of their income in federal taxes.

The rule targets millionair­es who make most of their money from investment­s — capital gains and qualified dividends, which have a top tax rate of 20 percent.

Liberals and many Democrats say rich families can afford to pay higher taxes because their incomes have grown much more than incomes for middleand low-income families.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States