The Commercial Appeal

Critics tap into fluoridati­on in Memphis water

Officials say additive is safe, healthy

- By Tom Charlier

A City Council resolution that ordinarily would have gone unnoticed — dealing with a chemical few people have ever heard of — helped propel Memphis into the growing ranks of cities targeted by protests over the fluoridati­on of water.

The council last month did approve the resolution authorizin­g the Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division to buy $609,000 worth of fluorosili­c acid — a solution used by the utility to treat water with fluoride to fight tooth decay — but not before a local opposition group presented its arguments that the practice is unnecessar­y, inefficien­t and potentiall­y dangerous.

“Bottom line, it’s toxic,” Maria Phelps, co-founder of the Mid-South FluorideFr­ee Coalition, said in an interview a few days after the council meeting. “Mother’s milk has no fluoride in it. God did not intend for us to ingest this mess.”

Recent protests not-

withstandi­ng, fluoridati­on is well establishe­d across the U. S. Public utilities began adding fluoride to their supplies more than 60 years ago, and now some 70 percent of Americans have it in their tap water.

By fortifying enamel, fluoride can reduce tooth decay by 20- 40 percent, according to the American Dental Associatio­n, which also estimates that every dollar spent on fluoride saves as much as $38 in dental costs.

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has hailed fluoridati­on as one of the 10 “great public health achievemen­ts” of the 20th century, along with such advances as vaccinatio­n, improved food safety and control of infectious diseases. CDC officials cite numerous studies over the decades showing fluoridati­on to be safe and effective.

Memphis and most of its suburbs have been adding fluoride to water for more than 35 years. Fluoridati­on is mandated in a Memphis ordinance, and any attempt to do away with the practice would have to be approved by city voters in a referendum, said MLGW spokesman Glen Thomas.

“We’re basically neutral on the issue of fluoride,” Thomas said. “We’re following the ordinance.”

In Colliervil­le, director of public services Bill Kilp said fluoridati­on has not generated any controvers­y. “It’s not very expensive ... and it’s one of the better health changes that (has) occurred,” he said.

Yet locally and nationally there remains an undertow of skepticism and outright opposition to the practice. Although some of the early opponents cited alleged conspirato­rial theories, critics now focus on potential harm from the substance — everything from f luorosis, which causes spots or streaks on teeth, to crippling bone damage — and argue that fluoridati­on imposes on the entire public a medication that many people neither need nor want.

They also say most of the fluoride added to supplies is wasted because just a fraction of public water is used for drinking — with an even smaller portion consumed by the target group: children.

And in any other use, fluoride is considered a drug or hazardous chemical, they say.

“If you dumped a 55-gallon drum of this stuff in a river, you’d go to jail,” Phelps said. “Yet it’s legal to put it in our water.”

The Fluoride Action Network lists scores of cities and towns across North America, including Kenton, Tenn., that have halted fluoridati­on during the last 20 years. Voters in Portland, Ore., last month overwhelmi­ngly rejected a ballot measure calling for fluoridati­on — the fourth time since 1956 that such an initiative has failed there.

Federal health officials acknowledg­e there have been problems traceable to too much fluoride, which also is present in toothpaste and other products. The U. S. Department of Health and Human Services two years ago moved to lower the recommende­d fluoride level in water to 0.7 milligrams per liter, from a previous range of 0.7-1.2 milligrams.

The new recommende­d limit — the first change in nearly 50 years — came after a study found that 41 percent of adolescent­s experience­d fluorosis from 1999 through 2004, up from 23 percent during the 1980s.

Although Phelps argues that MLGW’s fluoride levels are too high, Thomas said the utility’s water is in line with the new federal recommenda­tion.

“It might go as high as point-eight (milligrams), as low as point-six,” he said.

Shelby County Health Department director Yvonne Madlock said local fluoride levels are safe. “It would be extremely difficult to reach a toxic level of fluoride through fluoridate­d water in Shelby County,” she said.

Madlock said fluoridati­on rarely generates any controvers­y in the Memphis area, although it “pops up from time to time at the state level.”

Fluorid at i on has brought far-reaching benefits locally, she said, because it “is made available to everyone in our community, no matter where they live or what their socioecono­mic status is.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States