Unbending despite the consequences
Cooler, more experienced and almost certainly wiser heads of the Republican Party — the GOP governors — are warning their hot-blooded younger members of Congress not to force a government shutdown in an ill-advised attempt to kill President Barack Obama’s health care plan.
In what has been billed as an intraparty fight between the “purists” and the “pragmatists,” Republican governors, with the notable exception of Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, fall squarely in the pragmatist camp. They have responsibilities.
The sophomore and freshman classes of Republican House members, who are driving the idea of a shutdown, do not. In time, with institutional seniority, they will. But for now, they are free to be reckless and irresponsible, their plan to achieve by a threat to “rule or ruin” what they could not achieve democratically being the very definition of reckless and irresponsible.
During a wide-ranging discussion with The Commercial Appeal’s editorial board Tuesday, U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen of Memphis said those “tea party” members had an agenda of cutting spending no matter the consequences, or who or what those cuts would negatively impact.
Their plan is to vote against any of the 12 bills needed to run the government for the new fiscal year starting Oct. 1 if they contain any money for the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), effectively shutting down large parts of the government.
A political impasse between then-President Bill Clinton and the GOP Congress led to a government shutdown totaling 28 days in November and December 1995 and January 1996. Adroit juggling of accounts by then-Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, for which the Republicans threatened to impeach him, managed to somewhat mitigate the effects of the shutdown, but industries dependent on the government lost millions.
At the time, public opinion seemed to be along the lines of “a plague on both your houses,” but Clinton went on to easy re-election and House Speaker Newt Gingrich, an architect of the shutdown, went on to lose his job.
Unlike in 1995-96, House Republicans will be alone on the shutdown. Obama and Senate Democrats are in the stands with their drinks and popcorn while two wings of the Republicans slug it out. Meeting with other governors in Milwaukee over the weekend, GOP chief executives said that the cutoff of federal funds to constituents and, even worse, the uncertainty could do great economic damage to their states.
Even governors who virulently disagree with the act and have refused to implement key parts of Obamacare said the tactic was likely to backfire badly.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican, as he proved in taking on the state’s teachers union, is not one to back away from a fight. But he told The New York Times: “The worst part is the uncertainty. ... There’s nothing like the lack of a functioning government to instill uncertainty in both the citizens and their employers. I think there are other ways to pursue this.”