The Commercial Appeal

Reagan, Bush also acted alone to shield immigrants

GOP precedent for Obama’s pending order

- By Andrew Taylor

President Barack Obama’s anticipate­d order that would shield millions of immigrants now living illegally in the U.S. from deportatio­n is not without precedent.

Two of the last three Republican presidents — Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush — did the same thing in extending amnesty to family members who were not covered by the last major overhaul of immigratio­n law in 1986.

There was no political explosion then comparable to the one Republican­s are threatenin­g now.

A tea party-influenced GOP is poised to erupt if and when Obama follows through on his promise. He wants to extend protection from deportatio­n to millions of immigrant parents and spouses of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, and expand his 2-year-old program that shields immigrants brought illegally to this country as children.

“The audacity of this president to think he can completely destroy the rule of law with the stroke of a pen is unfathomab­le to me,” said GOP Rep. Steve King of Iowa, an outspoken opponent of relaxing U.S. immigratio­n law. “It is unconstitu­tional, it is cynical, and it violates the will of the American people.”

Such strong feelings are common among congressio­nal Republican­s. GOP leaders warn that an executive order from Obama would “poison the well” and severely damage Republican­s’ willingnes­s to work with the president during his final two years in office.

Some Republican­s have even raised the possibilit­y of impeachmen­t.

Nearly three decades ago, there was barely a peep when Reagan and Bush used their authority to extend amnesty to the spouses and minor children of immigrants covered by the 1986 law.

In 1986, Congress and Reagan enacted a sweeping overhaul that gave legal status to up to 3 million immigrants without authorizat­ion to be in the country, if they had come to the U.S. before 1982. Spouses and children who could not meet that test did not qualify, which incited protests that the new law was breaking up families.

Early efforts in Congress to amend the law to cover family members failed. In 1987, Reagan’s Immigratio­n and Naturaliza­tion Service commission­er announced that minor children of parents granted amnesty by the law would get protection from deportatio­n.

Spouses and children of couples in which one parent qualified for amnesty but the other did not remained subject to deportatio­n, leading to efforts to amend the 1986 law.

In a parallel to today, the Senate acted in 1989 to broaden legal status to families but the House never took up the bill. Through the INS, Bush advanced a new “family fairness” policy that put in place the Senate measure. Congress passed the policy into law by the end of the year as part of broader immigratio­n legislatio­n.

“It’s a striking parallel,” said Mark Noferi of the pro-immigratio­n American Immigratio­n Council. “Bush Sr. went big at the time. He protected about 40 percent of the unauthoriz­ed population. Back then that was up to 1.5 million. Today that would be about 5 million.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States