The Commercial Appeal

Local government­s adjust benefits rules

Some alter old policies to accommodat­e same-sex pairs

- 901-268-5074 By Ryan Poe poe@commercial­appeal.com

A week after the U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down state bans on same-sex marriage, government­s in the Greater Memphis area are still digesting what it means for benefits.

The court’s June 26 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges means municipali­ties, their agencies and other employers must begin treating spouses of gay employees like they would other employees’ spouses, providing health insurance and pension benefits.

For more than a year, Shelby County has offered benefits to all spouses of employees who were legally married according to other states’ laws, said Human Resources Administra­tor Mike Lewis. He doesn’t expect to have to make any policy changes.

“We believe we’re already in compliance,” he said.

But other municipali­ties, including the city of Memphis, are still researchin­g the specific changes they’ll have to make to their policies, and deciding whether they’ll immediatel­y accept marriages performed before the ruling or wait for open enrollment.

Those are discussion­s that should have already happened, said Ginger Leonard, a spokeswoma­n for the Tennessee Equality Project in Memphis. But, she said, delays are expected after a landmark decision, and as a whole, municipali­ties are cooperatin­g.

“They’re kind of having to feel their way through it like everyone else is,” she said.

For municipali­ties, the ruling will mean tweaks in policies and a small increase in the number of spouses seeking coverage, she said. Because of a lack of protection­s against workplace discrimina­tion, many employees will opt to stay silent about their marriages.

But for employees and their spouses, the changes are a “huge relief,” said Leonard, who was married in a same-sex ceremony in Washington in 2010. Thanks to the ruling, Leonard said, her spouse, who has a serious medical condition, will have health care through Memphis, Light, Gas & Water Division.

“To know we can get her the medication she needs is a weight off of my chest,” Leonard said.

The city of Memphis is accepting as a “life event” any same-sex marriages performed since the ruling, meaning those spouses can be added to employees’ health insurance plans before the next open enrollment begins in October.

“The law has changed, and we’re going to comply with the law,” said city Human Resources Director Quintin Robinson.

Like Leonard, Robinson said he doesn’t expect a large number of spouses to be added to plans as a result of the court’s ruling.

He said his office hasn’t researched= the effect on the pension policy, which allows spouses of retired employees to collect a reduced pension after the employee dies.

Janna Rogers, director of the DeSoto County Human Resources Department, said her office hasn’t discussed the ruling yet, but will obey any federal mandates.

“We haven’t gone dot by dot to see exactly,” she said when asked about policy changes that would have to be made.

Millington and Arlington have their health insurance through Shelby County, and so are already in compliance with the ruling.

Colliervil­le spokesman Mark Heuberger said the town’s policy takes its definition of marriage from the state, so no policy changes are expected.

Germantown Mayor Mike Palazzolo also said he doesn’t anticipate any changes. “The Supreme Court expanded the definition of marriage,” which by default expanded the city’s policy, he said.

Lakeland City Manager Jim Atkinson didn’t immediatel­y return a call.

The city of Memphis has already taken steps to protect its employees from discrimina­tion. The city has two liaisons to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgende­r community, one in Mayor A C Wharton’s office and the other in the police department.

Also, the City Council approved a nondiscrim­ination ordinance in October 2012 that protects against unfair workplace treatment based on sexual orientatio­n.

Shelby County approved an ordinance in 2010 that prohibited any discrimina­tion against employees for any reason other than merit.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States