The Commercial Appeal

Obama cries ‘neocon’ to push Iran deal

- ELI LAKE COLUMNIST Eli Lake is a Bloomberg View columnist who writes about politics and foreign affairs.

If you are a progressiv­e activist, President Obama can tell you everything you need to know about the Iran deal in one word: NEOCONS!

I overstate, but only slightly. Since the U.S. and five other world powers agreed to terms last month intended to lift sanctions and check Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, a key pillar of the White House argument for the deal is to point out who is against it.

Consider Obama’s message to progressiv­e activists last Thursday. In a conference call where only the president spoke, Obama warned his supporters, “You will hear a lot of arguments out there about why this is a ‘bad deal’ from people who, frankly, would be opposed to any deal with Iran.”

He went onto say that the arguments were bolstered by a $20 million ad campaign, a veiled reference to lobbying by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. He then said some of the campaign comprises “the same columnists and former elected, former administra­tion officials that were responsibl­e for us getting into the Iraq war and were making these exact same claims back in 2002, 2003, with respect to Iraq.”

This kind of dog whistling by Obama does a disservice to his supporters. He’s exploiting his base’s deep fear of all things neoconserv­ative. It’s true that neocons in 2002 and 2003 supported and argued for the Iraq war. So did both of Obama’s secretarie­s of state, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry. And yet in 2015, many prominent progressiv­es still obsess about the out-of-power neocons, and darkly imply that they undermine the national interest on behalf of Israel.

For Obama’s base, the neocons were not just policy intellectu­als on the wrong side of an unpopular war, but were instead agents who pulled off a kind of coup d’etat and foisted a war on an unsuspecti­ng public.

Most serious people don’t believe this anymore. But it’s nonetheles­s a popular fable among the net-roots to this day. What a terrifying world! Every election brings with it the prospect that our republic will fall under the power of a bunch of disloyal bureaucrat­s eager to shed American blood for Israel.

Suggesting that another disastrous war in the Middle East is just a few op-ed columns away, the president can activate progressiv­e bloggers, volunteers and activists who themselves should be disappoint­ed by Obama’s foreign policy. After all, Obama has yet to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay. Under Obama’s leadership, the use of drone strikes has increased and become commonplac­e in countries like Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan — nations where the U.S. is not formally at war. But if he reminds the base that he is the one fighting the neocons, it’s 2008 all over again.

This Iran deal will be Obama’s foreign policy legacy. It’s clever of him to frame the agreement as a triumph over the mentality that got us into the Iraq War. It discredits the deal’s opponents before they can tarnish the deal themselves. But this tactic also counts as what Obama once called “the politics of fear.” No, Obama isn’t warning activists that the other side isn’t vigilant enough against terrorism. He’s just saying his opponents seek war and only his policies can bring peace.

But the Iran deal is no peace treaty. It’s an executive agreement that broadly ends an economic war against Iran in exchange for Iran’s promise over the next 10 to 20 years to allow more transparen­cy and place some limits on its nuclear program. Iran is not committed to ending its support for terrorists or proxies that have killed Americans. In fact, as the region prepares for Iran to rise, Obama has promised to sell more arms to U.S. allies like Saudi Arabia and Israel, who consider Iran to be at war with them.

The best Obama can hope for in the aftermath of his deal is that over time Iran is deterred from continuing its aggression in the Middle East. But Iran isn’t likely to pull back unless it sees a credible chance that war will be waged against it. Obama may even find himself having to threaten Iran for the sake of peace in the region. Just don’t tell his base. They are frightened enough already.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States