The Commercial Appeal

US may miss dates to reunite families

- Alan Gomez USA TODAY

The Trump administra­tion argued in a court hearing Friday that it might not be able to fully comply with a federal judge’s order to reunite nearly 3,000 children separated from their parents by the end of the month.

The administra­tion must reunite about 100 children under age 5 by Tuesday and all other minors by July 26. But government lawyers said there is too much work to do and too many questions about the judge’s order to meet his strict deadlines.

During the hearing, Department of Justice lawyer Sarah Fabian said the government is stuck between the court’s strict deadlines and legal requiremen­ts that children in government custody be released only into safe environmen­ts.

“There really has been a massive effort on the part of the government to get the resources in place on the ground to make reunificat­ion happen in accordance with the court’s order,” Fabian said. But “there’s always going to be tension between a fast release and a safe release.”

The request for more time came a day after Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar held a conference call during which he assured reporters that the administra­tion would reunite all the children who had been separated. Azar criticized the ruling but vowed to meet the court-imposed deadlines.

“We will comply with the artificial deadlines establishe­d by the courts,” he said Thursday.

On Friday, Fabian said the government is struggling to complete the timeconsum­ing process of verifying the relationsh­ip between parents and children, locating parents who have been deported or released into the U.S., and ensuring that parents who have been found do not have a criminal record or pose a threat to their children.

U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, who issued the order to reunite the separated families, said he may extend his deadlines in extreme cases in which parents have been deported or have a criminal background. But he said the government must push ahead not only to reunite the nearly 3,000 children covered by his order but also to establish a system that can be used in future cases.

He urged the government to “do it in an efficient, quick manner, but of course never losing sight of the best interest of the child.”

He gave the Justice Department until Saturday evening to produce a list of the 101 children under age 5 who must be reunited. The judge will hold another hearing Monday to decide whether the government will get more time or must comply with his deadlines.

Lee Gelernt, an ACLU attorney leading the lawsuit, said an army of volunteers was standing by, ready to locate parents who have been deported or can’t be located in the U.S. He said those volunteers – a combinatio­n of lawyers and immigrant rights organizati­ons – will also help families with transporta­tion, housing and meals when they’re reunited with their children.

“The parents are going to have no money; they’re going to be put out on the street in Detroit or wherever,” he said. “And we are prepared to make sure every one of those parents has someone there with them when they walk out.”

In a series of court filings leading up to Friday’s hearing, the government argued that it has been working nonstop to comply with Sabraw’s order and provided explanatio­ns from Health and Human Services and Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t to lay out what has been done.

Jonathan White, of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedne­ss and Response at HHS, wrote that the agency has deployed nearly 300 personnel to serve as case managers and coordinato­rs to speed up the reunificat­ion process.

Robert Guadian, acting deputy assistant director for ICE’s Enforcemen­t and Removal Operations, wrote that his agency has reassigned agents from other assignment­s, including fugitive operations, to the work of reunifying families. He said 19 of the agency’s 26 field offices have been involved.

The two outlined a comprehens­ive, case-by-case analysis of all minors in custody due to immigratio­n violations to determine if they fall under Sabraw’s order. And, as Guadian explained, the first hurdle was the biggest.

Before Sabraw’s order, the government did not have a list of children who had been separated from their parents before Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy went into effect – or after. Guadian wrote that informatio­n was simply “not maintained as part of ICE’s regular business practice.”

That forced HHS to conduct a caseby-case review of all 11,800 minors in its custody to see which files included a mention of a family separation. Then, ICE followed up to determine exactly when and how the family was separated.

Further complicati­ng the reunificat­ion process was the realizatio­n that all children’s parents were not still in government custody. Some have been deported, some have been released into the U.S. on parole as they await hearings, and some haven’t been located at all.

The government says the cases in which officials can’t find the parents are the ones where it will be most difficult to fully comply with the judge’s order.

A federal complaint filed Friday claims the government has made matters worse by misplacing and, in some cases, destroying records of children separated from their parents.

Citizens for Responsibi­lity and Ethics in Washington filed a complaint with the National Archives and Records Administra­tion requesting an investigat­ion into reports that officials at Homeland Security and Health and Human Services have deliberate­ly destroyed records that showed parents were separated from their children. If there is no proof that a family was separated, the government would not be required to reunite them under the judge’s order.

 ??  ?? Sirley Silveira Paixao, an immigrant from Brazil seeking asylum, kisses her 10-year-old son, Diego Magalhaes, on Thursday after Diego was released from immigratio­n detention in Chicago. CHARLES REX ARBOGAST/AP
Sirley Silveira Paixao, an immigrant from Brazil seeking asylum, kisses her 10-year-old son, Diego Magalhaes, on Thursday after Diego was released from immigratio­n detention in Chicago. CHARLES REX ARBOGAST/AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States