The Commercial Appeal

Aid provider Oxfam plans exit from 18 countries

- Pan Pylas ASSOCIATED PRESS

LONDON – The decision by Oxfam Internatio­nal to close operations in 18 countries in response to the devastatin­g financial impact of the coronaviru­s pandemic was met with shock and sadness Thursday across developing countries where the aid organizati­on has often been helping the needy for decades.

Oxfam, which currently operates in 66 countries and whose global work is coordinate­d via 20 affiliate offices around the world, said in a statement late Wednesday that it has had to accelerate and deepen changes that it was mulling as a result of the pandemic.

“We’ve been planning this for some time but we are now accelerati­ng key decisions in light of the effects of the global pandemic,” said Oxfam Internatio­nal’s interim executive director, Chema Vera.

The most notable changes involve its exit from countries around the world. Among those it is planning to leave are Afghanista­n, Cuba, Egypt, Rwanda and Sri Lanka. It said 1,450 out of nearly 5,000 program staff could lose their jobs and that there will be an impact on 700 of its nearly 1,900 partner organizati­ons.

In Liberia, in West Africa, for example, Oxfam has been present since 1995 and has been helping local partners increase access to essential services like safe drinking water and sanitation facilities.

Bobby Whitfield, chairman and CEO of Liberia’s National Water Sanitation and Hygiene Commission, said in a statement that Oxfam’s decision to leave the country must have been “tough” but that it had come as a “shock.”

“Water, sanitation and hygiene are at the heart of this fight against COVID-19,” he said. “So it must be at the center of our response. To see one of our partners closing down their operations when we need them most is truly devastatin­g.”

And in nearby Sierra Leone, the country’s minister of developmen­t and economic planning, Dr. Francis Kaikai, said it was “unfortunat­e” that Oxfam, which has been working in the country since 1998, has had to leave, though he had yet to receive formal notification.

“We will feel it because they had their own niche in our developmen­t efforts,” he said. “Any partner we lose which is involved in our developmen­t plans, especially in the current global pandemic, is something of significan­ce to the government.”

Oxfam insisted that the changes will be phased and that its departure does not necessaril­y mean the end of its involvemen­t in those countries. It said it will continue to advise local aid agencies and could launch fundraisin­g events where and when needed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States