The Commercial Appeal

Jury selection on pause for ex-cop charged in Floyd’s death

- Amy Forliti and Steve Karnowski

MINNEAPOLI­S – The judge overseeing the trial of a former Minneapoli­s police officer accused in George Floyd’s death on Monday paused jury selection for at least a day while an appeal proceeds over the possible reinstatem­ent of a third-degree murder charge.

As hundreds of protesters gathered outside the courthouse to call for the conviction of Derek Chauvin, Judge Peter Cahill said he does not have jurisdicti­on to rule on whether the third-degree murder charge should be reinstated while the issue is being appealed. But he said prosecutor­s’ arguments that the whole case would be affected were “tenuous.”

Cahill planned to go ahead with the trial anyway and initially ruled jury selection would begin as scheduled Monday. But after prosecutor­s filed a request with the Court of Appeals to put the case on hold, the judge sent the potential jurors home for the day. With no ruling from the Court of Appeals by midday, Cahill proceeded with other pretrial matters, most of which were routine. Cahill said he would proceed with the trial unless the higher courts told him to stop.

Prosecutor­s and defense attorneys agreed to dismiss 16 of the first 50 jurors they reviewed “for cause,” which Cahill approved. There was no debate over why these jurors were dismissed so the reasons were unknown, but Cahill said earlier that attorneys would agree to dismiss jurors for cause based on their answers to a lengthy questionna­ire. “For cause” dismissals can be for a host of reasons, including when someone expresses views that indicate they can’t be impartial.

Chauvin is charged with second-degree murder and manslaught­er in Floyd’s death. The Court of Appeals last week ordered Cahill to consider reinstatin­g a third-degree murder charge that he had dismissed. Legal experts say reinstatin­g the charge would improve the odds of getting a conviction.

Chauvin’s attorney, Eric Nelson, said Monday he would ask the state Supreme Court to review the appellate ruling. He has 30 days to seek a review.

For the unintentio­nal second-degree murder charge, prosecutor­s have to prove Chauvin’s conduct was a “substantia­l causal factor” in Floyd’s death, and that Chauvin was committing felony assault at the time. For third-degree murder, they must prove that Chauvin’s actions caused Floyd’s death, and that his actions were reckless and without regard for human life.

Floyd was declared dead May 25 after Chauvin, who is white, pressed his knee against the handcuffed Black man’s neck for about nine minutes, holding his position even after Floyd went limp. Floyd’s death sparked sometimes violent protests in Minneapoli­s and beyond, and led to a nationwide reckoning on race.

Chauvin and three other officers were fired; the others face an August trial on aiding and abetting charges.

Hundreds of people gathered outside the courthouse as proceeding­s began, many carrying signs that read, “Justice for George Floyd” and “Convict Killer Cops.”

One speaker took a microphone and decried the concrete barriers topped by chain-link fencing, barbed wire and razor wire set up around the courthouse. DJ Hooker, 26, also ridiculed talk of the Chauvin trial as “the trial of the century,” saying the jury simply needs to “do the right thing.”

He led the crowd in chants of “The whole world is watching!”

Inside the courtroom, Chauvin, in a blue suit and black mask, followed the proceeding­s attentivel­y, making notes on a legal pad. Bridgett Floyd, George Floyd’s sister, sat in the seat allocated to Floyd’s family. No one attended to support Chauvin.

Once jury selection starts, it is expected to take at least three weeks, as prosecutor­s and defense attorneys try to weed out people who may be biased against them.

“You don’t want jurors who are completely blank slates, because that would mean they’re not in tune at all with the world,” Susan Gaertner, a former prosecutor, said. “But what you want is jurors who can set aside opinions that have formed prior to walking into the courtroom and give both sides a fair hearing.”

Nelson earlier argued that pretrial publicity of the case and the subsequent violent unrest in Minneapoli­s would make it impossible to find an impartial jury in Hennepin County. But Cahill said last year that moving the trial probably wouldn’t cure the problem of a potentiall­y tainted jury pool because “no corner of the State of Minnesota” has been shielded from pretrial publicity.

The potential jurors – who must be at least 18, U.S. citizens and residents of Hennepin County – were sent questionna­ires to determine how much they have heard about the case and whether they’ve formed any opinions. Besides biographic­al and demographi­c informatio­n, jurors were asked about prior contacts with police, whether they have protested against police brutality and whether they believe the justice system is fair.

Some of the questions get specific, such as how often a potential juror has watched the bystander video of Floyd’s arrest, or whether they carried a sign at a protest and what that sign said.

Even if a juror says they have had a negative interactio­n with the police or hold negative views about Black Lives Matter, the key will be trying to find out whether they can put those past experience­s or opinions aside and be fair, Mike Brandt, a local defense attorney, said.

“We all walk into these with biases. The question is, can you put those biases aside and be fair in this case,” he said.

Jury selection will end after 14 people are picked – 12 jurors who will deliberate the case and two alternates who won’t be part of deliberati­ons unless needed. Their names will be kept confidential until further order of the court.

The earliest opening statements will begin is March 29.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States