The Commercial Appeal

Taxpayers paying both teams in protracted death penalty battle

- Daniel Connolly from the public. Reach him at 529-5296, daniel.connolly@commercial­appeal.com, or on Twitter at @danielconn­olly

Killer Michael Rimmer probably won’t be executed anytime soon.

Tennessee’s government had scheduled his death for May 10, but the execution was called off, and the judge overseeing the case says the next round of appeals could take years to resolve.

The renewed fight illustrate­s the additional costs and legal complexiti­es that the death penalty creates. Rimmer’s case has already lasted more than 24 years, with two full trials and a resentenci­ng.

In the new round of appeals, taxpayers will fund the team of lawyers that’s trying to save Rimmer from execution.

And taxpayers will also fund another team of lawyers that’s trying to execute him.

Shelby County Criminal Court Judge Chris Craft explained Rimmer’s renewed appeals process in an interview with The Commercial Appeal. He said Rimmer recently filed a new petition for post-conviction relief.

“It usually takes a year or two to get these things done, because they’re gonna have witnesses and investigat­ors come and amendments to the petition. Rimmer filed the petition himself, so they’re gonna have to file an amended petition. So it’s gonna take a while.”

Rimmer has been found guilty in the killing of his ex-girlfriend Ricci Ellsworth, who disappeare­d in 1997 from her job at a Memphis motel. She is presumed dead, but her body was never found.

Rimmer’s case has been extensivel­y litigated for decades, including a jury trial in 1998 that led to his conviction and death sentence. Then an appeals court upheld the conviction but awarded him a new trial that focused only on his sentence: a jury again gave him the death penalty in 2004.

He won a second full trial after a judge concluded his defense counsel was ineffective and the prosecutio­n didn’t turn over evidence that could have helped Rimmer’s case. In 2016, his case went to a new jury, which again convicted him and sentenced him to death. Craft, the judge, oversaw the 2016 jury trial.

Rimmer has filed multiple appeals since then. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee at Jackson affirmed the Shelby County court’s decisions in 2019. The Tennessee Supreme Court affirmed the death sentence in 2021. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to review Rimmer’s case in 2022.

Rimmer’s new petition for post-conviction relief is dated March 28 and was entered into the court record on April 7.

Until now, Rimmer had not filed this particular type of post-conviction legal motion related to his latest conviction in 2016, the judge said.

Rimmer’s legal team wrote in this new motion that his trial lawyers were ineffective, falling short in their handling of various witnesses and legal issues.

The petition says Rimmer’s recent round of appeals didn’t address the issue of the effectiveness of his lawyers in the 2016 trial.

The Commercial Appeal’s efforts to reach trial attorney Robert Parris were unsuccessf­ul this week.

Rimmer’s legal team raised other issues, including that the second trial in 2016 violated Rimmer’s constituti­onal right against double jeopardy — being tried twice for the same crime.

The judge said that as soon as Rimmer filed the March 28 motion, Tennessee law compelled him to issue a stay of execution.

The judge signed the stay of execution on April 11. On the same day, the judge also appointed the Nashvilleb­ased Office of the Post-conviction Defender to represent Rimmer during the appeals process.

In 1995, the Tennessee legislatur­e had created the Office of the Post-conviction Defender to represent any person convicted and sentenced to death who is unable to hire a lawyer because of poverty.

(Rimmer’s petition says lawyers from this office already helped him draft the petition, which is written in precise legal language.)

As the Nashville team argues that the legal team that handled Rimmer’s latest trial was ineffective, the prosecutio­n will likely argue that Rimmer’s trial team was, in fact, effective and his conviction was valid, the judge said.

Because of the charges of prosecutor­ial misconduct, the Shelby County District Attorney’s office didn’t prosecute the 2016 trial against Rimmer — special prosecutor­s were brought in from outside the county.

Now, the Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference must find a prosecutio­n team from outside Shelby County to handle the death penalty appeal, the judge said.

Rimmer’s case had been scheduled to be heard in court on Friday according to online records, but the judge said he’s resetting the meeting until May 20. “Not for anybody to appear for a hearing or anything, but just for us to find out who the prosecutor is,” the judge said.

The two sides will trade legal filings, the judge said. “And then I’m going to try to get it set for a hearing. But that’s going to be probably this fall or maybe in the spring.”

Investigat­ive reporter Daniel Connolly welcomes tips and comments

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States