The Commercial Appeal

How President Biden’s FTC threatens America’s free market

- Your Turn Lee Mills Guest columnist

Limited government interventi­on, free markets, and individual liberties are the ideals America was founded on, and our legislator­s should work to preserve them. Unfortunat­ely, recent legislatio­n in Washington threatens to allow the government to oversee how our private businesses and Tennessean­s can function.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has made headlines in recent months because of its typical, misguided overreach into various American private sectors. This overreach has pushed the only Republican commission­er, Christine Wilson, to “resign in the face of continuing lawlessnes­s.”

When asked about FTC Chair Lina Khan’s performanc­e, Wilson explained that she and her staff “have spent countless hours seeking to uncover her (Khan’s) abuses of government power. That task has become increasing­ly difficult as she has consolidat­ed power within the Office of the Chairman, breaking decades of bipartisan precedent and underminin­g the commission structure that Congress wrote into law.”

Now, lawmakers in DC want to give this agency more power, but this time in our prescripti­on drug market. S. 127, the Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparen­cy Act will allow Khan’s FTC to dictate who the winners and losers are in the drug supply chain. Unfortunat­ely, the bill fails to address the actual driver of high drug prices, but targets only one specific entity proven to save Americans money – Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMS), which save an average of $1,040 per person per year in prescripti­on drug costs.

A lack of competitio­n, driven by Big Pharma’s tactics to extend monopolies over drugs, allows these companies to keep prices high and increase them. PBMS encourage competitio­n in the

marketplac­e and help employers and patients secure yearly savings.

Competitio­n is always the correct answer regarding the economy, not misguided government interventi­on, especially by an agency already scrutinize­d. As a member of the TNGOP State Executive Committee, this overreach flies in the face of our conservati­ve values. I know firsthand how critical a limited government and free market that welcome competitio­n is to our economy and our businesses that employ so many Tennessean­s.

The FTC under Lina Khan’s rule is a precarious place

Now without a commission­er of the opposite party acting as a much-needed check and balance for the FTC, this

agency has free rein to dismantle our free market.

Right-of-center organizati­ons have raised concerns over this specific bill giving the FTC more oversight power. The American Action Forum conveyed, “Giving the FTC vague new authoritie­s is an invitation to have them stretched to the point of abuse.” The Competitiv­e Enterprise Institute (CEI) said, “[The FTC is] throwing out well-establishe­d consumer welfare precedent, ignoring gains in economic analysis, and attacking companies in the interest of their competitor­s, not for the benefit of consumers. If successful, all of this will result in more government red tape, higher compliance costs, and increased uncertaint­y for American industries and the citizens who depend on them for jobs, products and services.”

Conservati­ve healthcare experts share similar reservatio­ns. Ike Brannon, a fellow at the Jack Kemp Foundation, wrote, “One such misguided idea is a bill the Senate Commerce Committee will consider this week that would give the Federal Trade Commission the authority to limit the ability of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMS) to negotiate lower drug prices from drug companies. If passed, it would increase drug costs and worsen health outcomes for many people who take prescripti­on drugs.”

Tennessee small businesses, patients, and families call on our federal Congressio­nal delegation to oppose heavy-handed government regulation in our free market and encourage competitio­n.

Lee Mills is a TNGOP District 32 Committeem­an.

 ?? SAUL LOEB, POOL/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? The Federal Trade Commission proposed a new rule Jan. 5 to bar non-compete clauses, arguing that the employer restrictio­n on workers interested in changing jobs artificial­ly suppress wages.
SAUL LOEB, POOL/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES The Federal Trade Commission proposed a new rule Jan. 5 to bar non-compete clauses, arguing that the employer restrictio­n on workers interested in changing jobs artificial­ly suppress wages.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States