The Commercial Appeal

COMPROMISE WAS ESSENTIAL TO FORM REPUBLIC THAT IS THE USA

- Your Turn Paul G. Summers Guest columnist

Editor's note: This is a regular feature on issues related to the Constituti­on and civics written by Paul G. Summers, retired judge and state attorney general.

Last time, we finished our study of Article VI of the Constituti­on, which dealt with the Supremacy Clause. The United States Constituti­on is the supreme and highest law in the land.

A federal statute or state constituti­on, law or order is inferior to the U.S. Constituti­on. Article VII, the final and last article, deals with ratificati­on, or approval, of the Constituti­on by the states.

Article VII: The Ratificati­on of the Convention­s of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishm­ent of this Constituti­on between the States so ratifying the Same.”

It took two-thirds of the13 states to ratify the Constituti­on

The draft document was signed on Sept. 17, 1787. It was submitted to the 13 states immediatel­y thereafter.

Debates ensued quickly. Individual protection of liberties and rights, allocation of federal power, power reserved to the states, and power of the new federal government – all these and other issues were vigorously debated.

Consequent­ly, supporters of the draft document promised a Bill of Rights once the Constituti­on was ratified. This was a compromise.

New Hampshire became the requisite ninth state to ratify the Constituti­on.

The date was June 21, 1788. Under the new United States Constituti­on, the new federal government began, by agreement, on March 4, 1789. That is when we officially had a constituti­onal republic called the United States of America.

We have now completed our study of the original Constituti­on of the United States.

The Bill of Rights were enacted as a compromise

Twelve amendments were approved by Congress in 1789. The first 10 amendments, called the Bill of Rights, were ratified as part of the Constituti­on on Dec. 15, 1791.

These amendments were a compromise between the anti-federalist­s and the Federalist­s to approve and ratify the original body of the Constituti­on. This is a prime example of how our leaders can compromise if in the best interest of our nation.

Little reason exists for them not to compromise today. This is especially true when they could agree over two centuries ago about something so important as the formation of our constituti­onal republic.

Our study of the Constituti­on, our “supreme law of the land,” shall continue in future articles in this publicatio­n. Our next article will delve into the Bill of Rights, the first ten Amendments to the Constituti­on.

There are a total of 27 Amendments. We plan to discuss each one in our articles.

Reading and studying the Constituti­on is time well spent.

Paul G. Summers is a lawyer. He is a former appellate and senior judge, district attorney general, and the Attorney General of Tennessee. Judge Summers resides in Holladay and Nashville.

 ?? WIKIMEDIA ?? “Washington at Constituti­onal Convention of 1787, signing of U.S. Constituti­on” by Junius Brutus Stearns.
WIKIMEDIA “Washington at Constituti­onal Convention of 1787, signing of U.S. Constituti­on” by Junius Brutus Stearns.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States