The Daily Press

The dollar sign president

- By RICH LOWRY (Rich Lowry is on Twitter @RichLowry) (c) 2021 by King Features Syndicate

So far, the defining word of the Biden era is "trillion."

The Joe Biden who portrayed himself as a moderate, old school, bipartisan dealmaker during the presidenti­al campaign is now a distant memory.

He's been replaced by the Joe Biden who is dazzling progressiv­es with his willingnes­s to "go big" -- in other words, spend jaw-dropping amounts that would have been unimaginab­le prior to the pandemic and are still shocking even now.

Why has Biden embarked on a historic spending splurge with nary a whisper of bipartisan support?

Well, Democrats talked themselves into the propositio­n that there basically isn't any such thing as spending too much money.

Relatedly, the party consensus is that Barack Obama went "too small," with a stimulus package under a trillion dollars insufficie­nt to the scale of post-financialc­risis recession.

Besides, spending is what Biden can actually do -- he can pass his stimulus and relief bills under the so-called reconcilia­tion rules in the Senate, requiring only 50 votes rather than the 60 it takes to break a filibuster.

Finally, any Democratic president is drawn to the heroic allure of FDR and wants to measure himself against the New Deal.

Biden had a recent meeting with historians in the White House at which FDR was much discussed. One of the participan­ts, historian Michael Beschloss, told Axios that FDR or LBJ may be the most apt analogue to how Biden is "transformi­ng the country in important ways in a short time."

There's no doubt that any Democratic president would envy the sheer amount of dollars that Biden is shoveling out the door.

In fiscal year 2019, the federal government, which wasn't exactly tightening its belt, spent $4.4 trillion.

Biden is on pace to roughly match that with his first two major legislativ­e initiative­s -- the $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief bill, and his new $2.3 trillion infrastruc­ture proposal.

The Biden team almost gives the sense that it is working backward -- starting with a big, eyepopping price tag and then figuring out what initiative­s can be thrown in to reach the top-line number.

The schools have tens of millions of dollars sitting unspent from prior relief bills, and here comes another $100 billion to upgrade school buildings in the infrastruc­ture bill.

The states were lavished with $350 billion in the COVID-19 relief bill, even though many of them didn't lose revenue during the pandemic. Why can't those dollars be spent on infrastruc­ture?

The new proposal is an infrastruc­ture, drinking-water, broadband, home-retrofitti­ng, manufactur­ing, long-term-care, electric-car, unionizati­on bill -and a few other things besides.

The question is whether, when all the money is spent, anyone will point to any transforma­tive change in the country attributab­le to the legislatio­n. Or whether, like the Obama stimulus, it will be completely forgettabl­e, money strewn over the landscape without leaving much of a trace.

Certainly, the need for infrastruc­ture spending over and beyond what the federal government, states and localities already spend is oversold.

A recent paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research noted: "Over the past generation, the condition of the interstate highway network improved consistent­ly, its extent increased modestly, and traffic about doubled. Over about the same time period, the condition of bridges remained about the same, the number of bridges increased slowly, and bridge traffic increased modestly."

Shooting money out of a bazooka is not self-evidently what the state of America's infrastruc­ture calls for. But when the only tool you have is huge reconcilia­tion spending bills, everything looks like a crisis urgently requiring more profligacy.

The bills are also a substitute for passing significan­t nonspendin­g policy changes. Unlike FDR, Biden has narrow and tenuous congressio­nal majorities. He's not getting HR1, gun control, a higher minimum wage or immigratio­n reform, and perhaps couldn't even if Senate Democrats eliminated the filibuster.

What he can do, which FDR and LBJ never could, is reach for the word "trillion" as much as possible.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States