The Dallas Morning News

Abbott renews call to limit feds’ power

Bills want Texas to join states trying to amend the U.S. Constituti­on

- By BRANDI GRISSOM Austin Bureau Twitter: @brandigris­som

AUSTIN — Gov. Greg Abbott led a cheering crowd of states’ rights supporters at the Capitol on Tuesday in a renewed effort to amend the U.S. Constituti­on and limit the authority of the federal government.

“It is you the people who are the answer to what ails America,” Abbott told the revved up audience. “This may be our last chance to get this right.”

Abbott’s speech came as Rep. Rick Miller, R-Sugar Land, and Sen. Brian Birdwell, R-Granbury, filed bills that would add Texas to a so-far-short list of states calling for a constituti­onal amendment to restrict the powers of the federal government.

The governor began calling for a convention of the states in January and has promised to make the issue a priority during the 2017 legislativ­e session, which starts Jan. 10.

Last year, Abbott released a nearly 70-page plan — part American civics lesson, part anti-Obama diatribe — detailing nine proposed constituti­onal amendments that he said would unravel the federal government’s decades-long power grab and restore authority over economic regulation and other matters to the states. Among the amendments Abbott suggested are requiring Congress to balance the budget, prohibitin­g Congress from regulating state activities and allowing a two-thirds majority of the states to override U.S. Supreme Court decisions.

The idea of a convention of the states is not a novel one. Former presidenti­al contender and U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, RFla., endorsed the idea of a convention to amend the Constituti­on and restore limited government. Congress would be forced to act on the states’ demands once 34 states joined the effort. So far, only eight have joined.

But the elections last month swept 33 Republican governors into office across the nation, and Abbott said that’s a hopeful sign for the movement to amend the Constituti­on. He also pointed to the election of Donald Trump, who has said he supports congressio­nal term limits that convention supporters want.

Lawmakers in Texas tried in 2015 to pass a measure calling for a convention of states. The bill passed in the House but failed in the Senate.

Miller said he was optimistic the 2017 session would end better.

“We know many states are lined up behind us, just waiting to see what Texas is going to do,” he said. “We must lead the way.”

A convention is one of two ways that the U.S. Constituti­on can be amended, and it’s described in Article V. One way is that Congress can propose amendments approved by twothirds of the members of both chambers. The other method allows two-thirds of the state legislatur­es to call for a convention to propose amendments. Republican­s who back the idea are confident that because they control state government in a majority of states, their ideas would prevail.

In both cases, the amendments become effective only if ratified by three-fourths of the states.

So far, the U.S. Constituti­on has been amended 27 times. None of those were amendments generated by a convention of states.

Critics say there’s a good reason. In an editorial lambasting Rubio’s plan, USA Today’s editorial board warned that such a process could invite mayhem and further poison the nation’s vitriolic political scene. It would also raise unresolved questions about the years-long process of ratificati­on. And some conservati­ves who otherwise agree with Abbott and Rubio on many issues fear a convention could lead to greater restrictio­ns on guns and money in politics and greater overall power for the federal government.

Abbott dismisses those criticisms, saying that he would call for a limited scope to the convention.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States