The Dallas Morning News

Would-be gramps: I want grandkids!


Adapted from an online discussion.

Dear Carolyn: For years, my oldest son and his girlfriend said they would never get married; she was against it. Then, five years ago, she relented and they got married, by all accounts happily.

They are financiall­y secure: well-paying jobs, no debt on their advanced degrees, a rental property they own outright, a manageable mortgage on their home, late-model cars.

Indeed, my son and his wife have worked hard, but their parents have also provided ongoing support.

But there is a rub: Our daughter-in-law steadfastl­y refuses to consider having children — and our son stands by her decision.

Her reason is climate change. In her opinion, it would be the height of cruelty to bring a child into a world that faces such an apocalypti­c and nihilistic future.

I will grant you that our country has this and other major problems. But there is an existentia­l question here: What have my and my wife’s lives amounted to if we have not inculcated a will to survive to the next generation?

To complicate matters, they channel all their energy into biking, hiking, kayaking, etc. We despair that our younger children will make the same choices, especially under the influence of their older sibling.

To many observers, it would seem our kids have been spoiled. But the urge to face an uncertain future and procreate in the face of adversity is supposed to be part of the human condition.

Every generation faces some dire threat. My father’s generation was told to go shoot Hitler. My generation learned to “duck and cover” to avoid nuclear annihilati­on. How can climate change be worse? Any advice?


Dear Despairing: Some might think it is a tremendous accomplish­ment to rear children who see a life for life’s sake as meaningful and complete.

“Some” being me.

I also think your expectatio­ns would be a Class A felony if there were such a thing as crimes against boundaries. The prerequisi­te for kids is wanting them (when equipped for their care). Your wanting children from them does not count.

And oh holy wow, your support obligates them to produce grandchild­ren for you not at all, not even the fading memory of a bit written in sand.

If they nixed children because they wouldn’t fit in their kayaks, I would support that just as fiercely. But being responsibl­e for children is enough of a lift without multiple existentia­l decentrali­zed threats.

Some would-be parents aren’t fazed by this, some are, and I stand fully behind both. Bullish procreatio­n “is supposed to be part of the human condition” — according to whom?

The couple decide their condition. And people only “steadfastl­y” refuse when others repeatedly ask, no? So stop. Repeatedly. Asking.

That she “relented” (gah!) on marriage is not an invitation to put another of her principled stands in a vise.

So one more bit of advice: Back the ever-loving heck off this issue. Or else I’ll throw more metaphors at you.

If anything is going to talk your younger kids out of procreatin­g under the dramatic orange skies of a planet on fire, it’ ll be your unshaken certainty that people owe you kids.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States