The Day

Trump: Obama ordered wiretap

President offers no evidence in claim against predecesso­r

- By PHILIP RUCKER, ELLEN NAKASHIMA and ROBERT COSTA

President Donald Trump on Saturday angrily accused former President Barack Obama of orchestrat­ing a “Nixon/Watergate” plot to tap the phones at his Trump Tower headquarte­rs in the run-up to last fall’s election, providing no evidence to support his explosive claim and drawing a flat denial from Obama’s office.

Leveling the extraordin­ary allegation about his predecesso­r in a series of four early morning tweets, Trump said Obama had been “wire tapping” his New York offices and suggested he had meddled with the “very sacred election process.” Obama’s supposed actions, Trump said, amounted to McCarthyis­m.

“Bad (or sick) guy!” the 45th president tweeted about the 44th, insisting that the surveillan­ce efforts resulted in “nothing found.”

Senior U.S. officials with knowledge of a wide-ranging federal investigat­ion into Russian interferen­ce in the election, which was begun during last year’s campaign, said Saturday that there had been no wiretap of Trump.

Kevin Lewis, a spokesman for Obama, said in a statement: “A cardinal rule of the Obama administra­tion was that no White House official ever interfered with any independen­t investigat­ion led by the Department of Justice. As part of that practice, nei-

ther President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillan­ce on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false.”

Officials at the FBI and the Justice Department declined to comment.

According to senior administra­tion officials, White House Counsel Donald McGahn and his office are inquiring about possible surveillan­ce of then-candidate Trump while being sensitive to legal and national security considerat­ions. “They will handle it appropriat­ely,” one official said.

It could not be immediatel­y determined whether there had been wiretaps of anyone in Trump's orbit who might be a subject of the Russia probe. Sen. Christophe­r Coons, D-Del., told MSNBC on Friday that he believes “transcript­s” exist that would show whether Russian officials colluded with Trump's campaign.

Wiretaps in a foreign intelligen­ce probe cannot legally be directed at a U.S. facility without probable cause — reviewed by a federal judge — that the phone lines or Internet addresses there were being used by agents of a foreign power or by someone spying for or acting on behalf of a foreign government.

Ben Rhodes, a longtime national security adviser to Obama, tweeted at Trump: “No President can order a wiretap. Those restrictio­ns were put in place to protect citizens from people like you.”

Neither Trump nor his aides offered any citation to back up his accusation about Obama. The president may have been prompted by a story on the conservati­ve website Breitbart and commentary from talk radio host Mark Levin suggesting that the Obama administra­tion used “police state” tactics to monitor the Trump team.

The Breitbart story circulated among Trump's senior aides Friday and early Saturday, and Trump may have simply been reacting to having read the piece when he took to his preferred megaphone, Twitter, to trumpet his claim.

Trump's tweets punctuated a general feeling shared by the president, his advisers and allies that Obama and the “Deep State” of critics within the intelligen­ce community who they think are fueling stories on Trump and Russia have been conspiring to derail his presidency. At the heart of each of the president's tweets is Trump's belief that Obama himself — as opposed to members of his administra­tion — had been personally overseeing surveillan­ce of Trump Tower.

The conservati­ve media landscape — from Sean Hannity's show on Fox News to Infowars, the conspiracy website run by Alex Jones, both outlets on which Trump has appeared — has in recent days given birth to tales, many of them false or unsubstant­iated, of Obama and his closest confidants meddling in Trump's affairs to try to spur his impeachmen­t or force his resignatio­n.

But separately, the president is furious that a slow churn of revelation­s about communicat­ions between Attorney General Jeff Sessions, ousted national security adviser Michael Flynn and other Trump associates and Russian officials has overshadow­ed the early weeks of his administra­tion. And he has grown fixated on identifyin­g leakers.

“He's angry, and he thinks that the leaks — even forgetting the rhetoric on politics — are a significan­t problem that hurts the security of the country,” said Thomas Barrack Jr., a close friend who chaired Trump's inaugurati­on. “He feels if he can't rely on his team, if he were negotiatin­g with North Korea on something sensitive and death by a thousand leaks continued, he views that as really being disruptive to the security of America.”

Trump has directed his aides to investigat­e employees across the federal government, with a particular focus on holdovers from the Obama administra­tion and career intelligen­ce officers, who Trump believes are trying to sabotage him.

White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon has been in close touch with the president about what he has called the Deep State. Bannon's remarks in a recent speech about the “deconstruc­tion of the administra­tive state” were designed in part to raise alarm among activists on the right about entrenched bureaucrat­s in the intelligen­ce and defense agencies, according to White House officials.

Roger Stone, a longtime political adviser to Trump who does not work in the administra­tion but still talks with the president, said he is urging Trump to fire and prosecute anyone who leaks damaging informatio­n.

“What the president doesn't understand is he has more power than he knows,” Stone said. “He needs to clean house. Just clean house! Hand the pink slips to everybody . ... Lock them out of their offices and tell the FBI to start going through their emails and phone messages.”

Trump was incensed over Sessions' decision to recuse himself from the Russia probe in the wake of The Washington Post's report that he had met twice with the Russian ambassador, which he did not disclose during his Senate confirmati­on hearing.

In the Oval Office on Friday morning, Trump fumed at his senior staff about the Sessions situation and told them that he disagreed with the attorney general's move, according to senior White House officials who were not authorized to speak publicly.

Trump told aides that he thought the White House and Justice Department should have done more to counter the argument that Sessions needed to step away. He said he wanted to see his staff fight back against what he saw as a widespread effort to destabiliz­e his presidency, the officials said.

Trump then departed for Palm Beach, Fla. — in what one associate described as “a [expletive] bad mood” — to spend the weekend at his private Mar-a-Lago Club, where he fired off Saturday morning's wiretappin­g tweets.

Trump amended his public schedule Saturday to add an early evening meeting with Sessions and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, as well as dinner with both men and other advisers, including Bannon.

If the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Court approved a wiretappin­g order on one of Trump's associates, that would mean the federal judge involved had decided there was probably cause that the person was colluding with a foreign government.

Some current and former intelligen­ce officials cast doubt on Trump's wiretappin­g assertion.

“It's extremely unlikely that there would have been any sort of criminal or intelligen­ce surveillan­ce of Trump,” said Jennifer Daskal, a former senior Justice Department national security official. “There's no credible evidence yet to suggest that that happened. It would be an extraordin­ary measure for the FBI to ask for and the court to grant a surveillan­ce order on a presidenti­al candidate of the opposing party in an election year.”

Most Republican leaders were quiet on the issue Saturday, but Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., vowed at a town hall meeting with constituen­ts to “get to the bottom of this.” He said it would be “the biggest scandal since Watergate” if either Obama illegally spied on Trump or a judge approved a warrant to monitor Trump's campaign for possible communicat­ions with Russia.

“I'm very worried that our president is suggesting that the former president has done something illegally,” Graham said. At the same time, because of what it would signal, “I would be very worried if in fact the Obama administra­tion was able to obtain a warrant lawfully about Trump campaign activity with foreign government­s.”

Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., called for Trump to provide the public more informatio­n about his charges. “We are in the midst of a civilizati­on-warping crisis of public trust, and the President's allegation­s today demand the thorough and dispassion­ate attention of serious patriots,” Sasse said in a statement.

Democrats, meanwhile, blasted Trump. Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the ranking Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligen­ce, said the president leveled a “spectacula­rly reckless allegation” against Obama without evidence.

Referencin­g Trump's descriptio­n of Obama as a “bad (or sick) guy,” Schiff said in a statement, “If there is something bad or sick going on, it is the willingnes­s of the nation's chief executive to make the most outlandish and destructiv­e claims without providing a scintilla of evidence to support them.”

Daskal, who now teaches law at American University, agreed. “It is extremely dangerous for the president to be suggesting that he was being surveilled for political purposes, when there is absolutely no evidence of that fact,” she said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States