The Day

Stop stalling, Mr. Simmons, and release report

Stonington officials received a report back in January recommendi­ng ways to improve efficiency. It still has not been released to the public. It should be made available, immediatel­y.

-

When Stonington’s Board of Selectmen last year hired an expert on municipal government operations to study the town’s department­s, it did so in an effort to embrace contempora­ry best practices. Such forward thinking should benefit the town’s residents in the long run.

Indeed, when First Selectman Rob Simmons received a 20-page draft report from former Newington town manager Keith Chapman in January, he wasted little time implementi­ng some of the report’s 50 recommenda­tions. Unfortunat­ely, the public has not yet had the opportunit­y to read the report to get a firsthand understand­ing of its scope and depth.

That needs to change, now. Release the report. Something that has been paid for and is being implemente­d is in no way a “draft report” exempted from public view. In any event, the state’s Freedom of Informatio­n law allows withholdin­g draft documents from the public only when “the public agency has determined that the public interest in withholdin­g such documents clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure.”

Yet Simmons will not release the report, saying it is still considered a draft. He recently told Day reporter Joe Wojtas the Board of Selectmen has been preoccupie­d with putting the proposed 2017-18 budget in order and, as such, has not yet had time to thoroughly review and approve the report.

It is hard to imagine that the need for town officials to review the report outweighs the public interest in knowing how an outside consultant concluded their town could run more efficientl­y. Even if the selectmen opt not to include some of the report’s recommenda­tions in their future plans for the town, citizens have the right to know what those recommenda­tions were. They paid for them.

The Day last week filed a state Freedom on Informatio­n request for the report. The town had four business days to respond. Simmons, who in winning election promised a government far more transparen­t than that of his predecesso­r, should not put the newspaper in a position of having to file a complaint.

We believe Stonington’s Board of Selectmen was right to commission the study and report. Too often in this Land of Steady Habits, government­al practices and procedures continue only because people are set in their ways, can’t recall a time when practices were different nor take the time to envision how practices could be improved.

Simmons, along with selectmen Mike Spellman and Kate Rotella did the right thing when they concluded that the way things always have been is not good enough for Stonington. Inefficien­cies are not just frustratin­g for residents and those who must do business with town, they also can be costly and in frugal Stonington, that should be reason enough to recommend better ways of doing business.

Still, Stonington residents have a right to know what they paid for. The town spent $15,000 in taxpayer money to commission the report.

Simmons said he is initiating a process to review the report line by line and get it finalized, approved and released to the public as soon as possible. That smacks of trying to control the flow of informatio­n. Here’s a suggestion for getting the informatio­n to the public as soon as possible — release the report, then continue the review and let the townspeopl­e know what you plan to do.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States