The Day

FBI probe said to include Trump aide

White House does not dispute report that staffer close to president is under federal scrutiny

- By NOAH BIERMAN and LISA MASCARO

Washington — President Donald Trump told a pair of Russian envoys that his abrupt decision to fire FBI Director James B. Comey — whom he described as “crazy, a real nut job” — had relieved “great pressure” on him because of the Russia investigat­ion, according to a published report.

Adding to Trump’s cascading legal and political woes, the FBI investigat­ion reached directly into the White House for the first time Friday with a separate report that an unnamed Trump aide is under federal scrutiny as a person of significan­t interest.

The White House did not dispute either account, which created a new furor just as Trump was taking off from Andrews Air Force Base on his first official trip overseas, a nine-day visit to five countries in the Middle East and Europe.

Until now, the FBI probe was only known to be focused on whether members of Trump’s campaign or other associates had colluded with Russian intelligen­ce to interfere with the 2016 presidenti­al race.

The designatio­n of a person of interest does not signal that criminal charges are imminent, or even likely, for one of Trump’s aides. But it does suggest the inquiry has moved into a new phase, one potentiall­y far more damaging for the president since it now appears in his direct orbit.

The investigat­ion, which began last July, clearly is accelerati­ng. A federal grand jury in Virginia has issued subpoenas and the FBI is conducting interviews. On Wednesday, the Justice Department formally handed off the investigat­ion to a special counsel, former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, to ensure its independen­ce from White House pressure.

Comey agreed Friday to testify in public to the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee after the Memorial Day holiday, according to a statement from the committee. He has told associates that he kept detailed memos of his conversati­ons with Trump, including one in which he said the president told him to “let go” of an investigat­ion.

Three other congressio­nal panels — the House Intelligen­ce Committee, the Senate Judiciary Committee and the House Oversight Committee — are conducting separate inquiries. Former CIA Director John Brennan is scheduled to testify Tuesday to the House Intelligen­ce Committee.

The latest two accounts were first

reported by The Washington Post and The New York Times.

The timing underscore­d that Trump will get no respite from the growing swirl of scandals he faces in Washington even as he meets dozens of heads of state in elaborate ceremonies and attends high-powered summits abroad.

Trump has repeatedly vented his frustratio­n with the FBI investigat­ion, denouncing it on Twitter this week as “the single greatest witch hunt of a politician in American history!”

The investigat­ions are creating more political hurdles for Republican lawmakers, who fear the Trump tumult will torpedo their legislativ­e agenda.

The Post story did not identify who in the White House the FBI now considers a person of interest, although it said the individual is “someone close to the president.”

In a statement, White House press secretary Sean Spicer did not confirm or deny that a White House aide had been caught up in the FBI inquiry.

“As the president has stated before — a thorough investigat­ion will confirm that there was no collusion between the campaign and any foreign entity,” Spicer said.

The Justice Department declined to comment. “As a matter of policy, we don’t comment on the existence or non-existence of investigat­ions or targets of investigat­ions,” said spokeswoma­n Sarah Isgur Flores.

The New York Times cast a new light on Trump’s firing of Comey last week, a dismissal that sparked political turmoil when the White House issued a series of conflictin­g reasons.

The Times has read what was described as the official White House memo chroniclin­g Trump’s meeting with Russia’s foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, and its ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, in the Oval Office on May 10, the day after Comey was fired.

“I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job,” Trump told them, according to the Times. “I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”

That statement would appear to constitute Trump’s most direct admission that he fired the FBI director in an attempt to affect the investigat­ion.

The top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland, called the reported conversati­on “extremely troubling.” He asked Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, to subpoena the White House memo.

Some Republican­s seemed equally astonished.

“Assuming it’s in context and assuming it’s accurate, it is a reckless thing for a president to say, particular­ly to Russian” officials, said Ari Fleischer, who routinely sat in on meetings with foreign dignitarie­s while serving as President George W. Bush’s press secretary.

“Did he really think dismissing Comey would get rid of the investigat­ion?” Fleischer asked. “One, it doesn’t work like that. And two, it would be more than reckless if the president thought it worked like that, and that’s why he did it.”

Notes from Oval Office meetings and phone calls with foreign leaders are often written down by an aide in what are called MEMCONs, or memorandum­s of conversati­ons. These are distribute­d over a classified computer system to senior officials or Cabinet members on a needto-know basis. The memos can include quotes from the conversati­on.

Michael Allen, a former senior director on the National Security Council in the George W. Bush White House, said that transcript­s of meetings with foreign leaders usually “are treated like the crown jewels.”

“This is an extraordin­ary release of what are intended to be private conversati­ons,” Allen said.

In a statement Friday, Spicer did not deny the substance of the Times story. Instead, he suggested that Trump’s comment about easing “great pressure” on him referred to his ability to improve relations with Russia.

“The president has always emphasized the importance of making deals with Russia as it relates to Syria, Ukraine, defeating (Islamic State) and other key issues for the benefit and safety of the American people,” Spicer said.

Comey’s “grandstand­ing and politicizi­ng the investigat­ion” had “created unnecessar­y pressure on our ability to engage and negotiate with Russia,” Spicer said.

He added, “Once again, the real story is that our national security has been undermined by the leaking of private and highly classified conversati­ons.”

The White House initially said Trump fired Comey because of a recommenda­tion by Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general.

Trump later told NBC News that he would have fired Comey regardless of a Justice Department recommenda­tion and that he had the “Russia thing” on his mind when he made the decision.

Trump has said repeatedly that he is not personally under investigat­ion. He repeated that to reporters Thursday, but left room for the possibilit­y with other members of his administra­tion or his campaign.

“There’s no collusion between, certainly, myself and my campaign — but I can always speak for myself — and the Russians — zero,” he said. He appeared to mean that he could “only” speak for himself.

The developmen­ts came as Rosenstein spent his second consecutiv­e day on Capitol Hill delivering an extraordin­ary briefing for all House members on his decision to name a special counsel to take over the Russia inquiry.

Rosenstein told lawmakers that he knew Trump wanted to fire Comey before he wrote a memo to the president outlining his own concerns over Comey’s performanc­e. The White House initially cited that memo as the reason Trump fired the FBI director.

“I wrote it. I believe it. I stand by it,” Rosenstein told lawmakers, according to text of his opening statement released publicly.

Rosenstein also disputed reports that Comey had asked for more staff and funding for the FBI investigat­ion. “I am not aware of any such request,” he said.

The hourlong session captivated lawmakers, who packed the session, as senators did for Thursday’s all-Senate briefing.

Mueller’s appointmen­t as special counsel has been widely praised by lawmakers in both parties, and many hope the investigat­ion will begin to bring some answers to the chaos that has upended Trump’s White House.

Applause erupted when Rosenstein told lawmakers that his intent in naming Mueller was to restore Americans’ confidence in the political process.

“For the first time, there’s this willingnes­s on this particular issue to jointly push back and to show a level of independen­ce,” said Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., a member of the House Intelligen­ce Committee.

The designatio­n of a person of interest does not signal that criminal charges are imminent, or even likely, for one of Trump’s aides. But it does suggest the inquiry has moved into a new phase, one potentiall­y far more damaging for the president since it now appears in his direct orbit.

Los Angeles Times staff writers Brian Bennett and Joseph Tanfani contribute­d to this report.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States