The Day

Theme parks wanted

- DAVID COLLINS d.collins@theday.com

Since the very beginning of developmen­t of Foxwoods Resort Casino, the rural little town of North Stonington aggressive­ly practiced a strategy that planning officials might have deemed containmen­t.

The town, which, like the two other towns adjacent to the Mashantuck­et Pequot reservatio­n, had no control over the enormous resort growing topsy-turvy on its border, chose essentiall­y to ignore rather than engage.

North Stonington might have tried to capitalize from the beginning on the newly energized Route 2 and allowed new commercial developmen­t to take advantage of the spike in traffic.

Instead, from a planning perspectiv­e, the town chose disengagem­ent, declining to make the zoning changes that would have flipped much of the Route 2 corridor from residentia­l to commercial. What was already commercial stayed that way.

The result is the strange approach today to Foxwoods, which rises out of the rural landscape of North Stonington like Oz, with little preamble for approachin­g visitors in the way of strip malls, hotels and burger joints.

Curiously, this resolve, to ignore and isolate the resort developmen­t, is being reconsider­ed at a time when the future of Foxwoods is more uncertain than ever, likely to see sharp declines in attendance as new casinos open in Massachuse­tts.

Mohegan Sun, too, is bracing for this sea change, as fewer gamblers find their way to the remote destinatio­n resort near Montville, playing closer to home instead.

The Mohegans have sketched out a strategy for this eventualit­y, hoping to bring in new attraction­s at the nearby Norwich Hospital property in Preston, which might draw tourists who also would visit the casino and gamble.

The underlying premise of this strategy is to find other developers willing to invest in and build these attraction­s, resort amenities, theme parks and amusements, without significan­t investment by the tribe.

The Pequots succeeded in this strategy in enticing a developer to build an outlet mall on their property, leveraging the land and proximity to the casino without actually building the attraction.

Now North Stonington, with an eye toward reinventin­g the Route 2 corridor with developmen­t related to Foxwoods, could put the two tribes in more direct competitio­n than ever, this time more for well-financed resort developers rather than slot machine players. I wish them luck with that. I always admired North Stonington’s preservati­on-minded, stiff-upper-lip approach to Foxwoods: You do what you can, we’re not changing.

I understand that the new thinking — to allow general kinds of resort developmen­t on large tracts — still would not create the kind of strip developmen­t and obvious commercial­ization you might think of as highway clutter.

It does make you wonder, though, what happens to the remaining residentia­l property, which the containmen­t strategy devalued over the years as Route 2 became a major thoroughfa­re.

It is also interestin­g that the town would have this change of philosophy toward Route 2 zoning, at a time when the number of total visitors to Foxwoods is about to plummet.

In any case, whether or not North Stonington decides to get into the resort destinatio­n developmen­t game, it looks like the two tribes might both be looking for the next big indoor surf beach or simulated ski resort that might put more bodies in front of their slot machines.

The Pequots still own a lot of land around North Stonington, beyond the reservatio­n, that might be suitable, with the town willing, for this kind of developmen­t.

Or maybe this is about to be the bitter end of the growth curve for Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun, and no amount of traffic-generating theme park developmen­ts is likely to save them here.

In that case, North Stonington may be very late to the game.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States