The Day

Possible deal would slash Trump’s wall money

White House said to be willing to accept bipartisan agreement

- By ALAN FRAM and ANDREW TAYLOR

Washington — Congressio­nal bargainers worked toward a border security deal Friday amid indication­s that the White House was preparing to accept a bipartisan agreement that would give President Donald Trump a fraction of the money he’s demanded for his proposed southern border wall.

Participan­ts said they expect money for physical barriers to end up well below the $5.7 billion that Trump has sought to begin constructi­on of the wall, which has attained iconic significan­ce for him and his conservati­ve supporters. Underscori­ng the clout he’s lost during a battle that’s dominated the opening weeks of divided government, the amount seems sure to fall much closer to $1.6 billion, the participan­ts said, a figure that was in a bipartisan Senate bill last year.

“That’s what we’re working toward,” said Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif., one bargainer.

An agreement would also avert a new partial federal shutdown next weekend. Trump has warned he might trigger a new closure of agencies if he doesn’t get his way, but that threat has become toothless because of solid opposition from GOP lawmakers burned by the record 35-day closure that he initiated in December.

One White House aide said Trump was expected to back whatever compromise emerges and acknowledg­ed there is no will among congressio­nal Republican­s for another shutdown. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal discussion­s.

Coupled with a widespread expectatio­n that the agreement would not use the term “wall,” the pact would represent a significan­t retreat for Trump, for whom “Build the wall!” has been a battle cry since his presidenti­al campaign.

Democrats seemed to draw a firm line on spending.

“Throughout the talks, Democrats have insisted that a border security compromise not be overly reliant on physical barriers,” said Evan Hollander, spokesman for Democrats who control the House Appropriat­ions Committee. “We will not agree to $2 billion in funding for barriers.”

In another signal that Trump was reluctantl­y preparing to give ground, the White House has been considerin­g accepting the deal but also using executive action to secure additional barrier funding without lawmakers’ approval. That plan was described by two people familiar with White House thinking who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. Depending on what Trump does, such an action could spark lawsuits or congressio­nal votes of disapprova­l.

Trump supporters have said there are other executive powers Trump could use to divert money from the budget to wall constructi­on, though it was unclear if they would face challenges in Congress or the courts. One provision of the law lets the Defense Department provide support for counter-drug activities.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States