The Day

Dems weigh what to do about Trump’s deeds

- By ELANA SCHOR

Washington — With a familiar chant, President Donald Trump’s backers regularly called for Hillary Clinton to be thrown in prison during the 2016 campaign. Now top Democrats are grappling with fraught questions about whether to lock HIM up.

As Democrats in Congress press for continued investigat­ion of Trump while he remains in office, the party’s presidenti­al candidates are weighing how to address his alleged misdeeds when he’s no longer in the White House. It’s a question that raises the potential of Democrats politicizi­ng law enforcemen­t, something they’ve blasted Trump for doing.

Democratic presidenti­al candidate Kamala Harris said in an interview released Wednesday that if she wins the White House, her Justice Department “would have no choice” but to pursue an obstructio­n of justice case against Trump after he leaves office.

Harris’ comments come after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told fellow Democrats that she would rather see Trump defeated in the election, then imprisoned, than impeached in Congress. That’s partly a way to quiet the push from multiple Democrats vying to replace Trump, who want their party to start the impeachmen­t process.

Vowing to seek charges against Trump after he leaves office brings risk for Democratic White House hopefuls, given their own party’s repeated excoriatio­ns of the president for politicizi­ng the Justice Department, as when he threatened repeatedly in the 2016 campaign to prosecute Clinton once he became president.

Even the idea of impeachmen­t, though popular with Democrats’ base voters, is shy of majority support with the general public, polls indicate.

Harris’ comments raise questions about how willing Democrats are to keep bending norms of government­al behavior, such as the usually bright line between politics and federal prosecutio­ns, that Trump has shattered.

The California Democratic senator, who is running in part on the strength of her legal and law enforcemen­t experience, appears to have taken a step farther than her opponents in affirming that a Justice Department in her administra­tion “should” look at charging Trump with obstructio­n after his presidency.

“Everyone should be held accountabl­e,” Harris told NPR in an interview. “And the president is not above the law.”

Mueller has said he was unable to exonerate Trump of obstructio­n but couldn’t pursue potential charges because of a Justice Department policy that bars the indictment of a sitting president. Harris has said she would ask her Justice Department to re-examine that policy. Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachuse­tts has pledged outright to end it if she’s elected president.

Harris, a former California attorney general who previously was San Francisco’s district attorney, later said she would not dictate the outcome of any prospectiv­e efforts to charge Trump.

“The facts and the evidence will take the process where it leads,” she said.

But she also told NPR that “I’ve seen prosecutio­n of cases on much less evidence” than Mueller’s report amassed against Trump.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States