The Day

New limits planned for green cards

Connecticu­t among states to fight ‘cruel and racist’ campaign

- By COLLEEN LONG and JILL COLVIN

Washington — The Trump administra­tion announced Monday it is moving forward with one of its most aggressive steps yet to restrict legal immigratio­n: Denying green cards to many migrants who use Medicaid, food stamps, housing vouchers or other forms of public assistance.

Federal law already requires those seeking to become permanent residents or gain legal status to prove they will not be a burden to the U.S. — a “public charge,” in government speak —but the new rules detail a broader range of programs that could disqualify them.

It’s part of a dramatic overhaul of the nation’s immigratio­n system that the administra­tion has been working to put in place, despite legal pushback. While most attention has focused on President Donald Trump’s efforts to crack down on illegal immigratio­n, including recent raids in Mississipp­i and the continued separation of migrant parents from their children, the new rules target people who entered the United States legally and are seeking permanent status.

Trump is trying to move the U.S. toward a system that focuses on immigrants’ skills instead of emphasizin­g the reunificat­ion of families.

Under the new rules, U.S. Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services will now weigh whether applicants have received public assistance along with other factors such as education, income and health to determine whether to grant legal status.

The rules will take effect in mid-October. They don’t apply to U.S. citizens, though immigrants related to the citizens may be subject to them.

Connecticu­t on Monday said it will try to stop the new Trump administra­tion policy.

Calling it part of a “cruel and racist campaign,” Connecticu­t Attorney General William Tong said he intends to join other states in a challenge to the new rule. That rule is part of a far-reaching policy aimed at slowing the flow of legal immigratio­n and reducing the number of poor immigrants by forbidding admittance

into the United States those deemed at risk of becoming “public charges.”

“The Trump administra­tion’s illegal and unconstitu­tional new scheme is a direct attack on access to the American dream,” Tong said “This country was built by immigrants like my parents who worked themselves up from poverty. This rule is the latest chapter in this administra­tion’s cruel and racist campaign to intimidate and punish immigrants of color.”

Tong said he is “in close coordinati­on with partner states and am prepared to take imminent legal action to block this unlawful and hurtful rule.”

Ken Cuccinelli, acting director of Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services, said the rule change will ensure those who come to the country don’t become a burden, though they pay taxes.

“We want to see people coming to this country who are self-sufficient,” Cuccinelli said. “That’s a core principle of the American dream. It’s deeply embedded in our history, and particular­ly our history related to legal immigratio­n.”

Migrants make up a small percentage of those who get public benefits. In fact, many are ineligible for such benefits because of their immigratio­n status.

Immigrant rights groups strongly criticized the changes, warning the rules would scare immigrants away from asking for needed help. And they voiced concern the rules give officials too much authority to decide whether someone is likely to need public assistance in the future.

The Los Angeles-based National Immigratio­n Law Center said it would file a lawsuit, calling the new rules an attempt to redefine the legal immigratio­n system “in order to disenfranc­hise communitie­s of color and favor the wealthy.”

And David Skorton, president and CEO of the Associatio­n of American Medical Colleges said, “The consequenc­es of this action will be to potentiall­y exacerbate illnesses and increase the costs of care when their condition becomes too severe to ignore,”

“This change will worsen existing health inequities and disparitie­s, cause further harm to many underserve­d and vulnerable population­s and increase costs to the health care system overall, which will affect all patients,” he said in a statement.

Cuccinelli defended the move, insisting the administra­tion was not rejecting longheld American values.

Pressed on the Emma Lazarus poem emblazoned below the Statue of Liberty that reads: “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,” he told reporters at the White House: “I’m certainly not prepared to take anything down off the Statue of Liberty.”

A new Pew Research Center survey released Monday found the American public is broadly critical of the administra­tion’s handling of the wave of migrants at the southern border, with nearly two-thirds of Americans — 65 percent — saying the federal government is doing a very bad or somewhat bad job. The survey found broad support for developing a pathway to legal status for immigrants living in the country illegally.

On average, 544,000 people apply for green cards every year, with about 382,000 falling into categories that would be subject to the new review, according to the government. Guidelines in use since 1999 refer to a “public charge” as someone primarily dependent on cash assistance, income maintenanc­e or government support.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States