The Day

HOUSE DEMOCRATS SUGGEST TOLLING ONLY TRUCKS

- By MARK PAZNIOKAS and KEITH M. PHANEUF

Hartford — Democratic leaders of the Connecticu­t House of Representa­tives are suggesting the governor reconsider tolling just big trucks, a now-defunct idea the Democrat had campaigned on during last year’s election.

House Speaker Joe Aresimowic­z and House Majority Leader Matt Ritter on Tuesday called on Gov. Ned Lamont to consider truck-only tolls on 12 of the 14 bridges in his latest 10-year, $21.3 billion CT2030 transporta­tion improvemen­t plan.

They estimate the tolls could raise about $150 million annually. That’s about half of the revenue generated by 14 tolls on all drivers in Lamont’s latest plan, which has been met with opposition by Republican­s and some Democrats.

The House Democratic majority offered a transporta­tion financing plan Tuesday that recycles a campaign proposal made and abandoned by Gov. Ned Lamont: Trucks-only tolls to be charged at a dozen bridges on interstate highways in Connecticu­t.

The concept was quickly welcomed by Senate President Pro Tem Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven, whose unyielding opposition effectivel­y killed Lamont’s broader proposal of charging tolls on all motor vehicles at 14 tolling gantries.

“Some members of our caucus would favor that,” Looney said, saying it keeps faith with a campaign promise Lamont made last year. “The original plan he ran on — the trucks-only — is the only voter-tested proposal that is out there.”

Lamont praised the House Democrats for reviving an approach that shares two of his goals: Finding a dedicated revenue source for his 10-year infrastruc­ture plan, CT2030, that taps out-of-state drivers and can leverage low-cost federal financing.

“I am appreciati­ve of House Democrats’ thoughtful contributi­on to the discussion about Connecticu­t’s economic future and the critical need for investment in our transporta­tion system,” Lamont said. “A guiding principle of CT2030 is a dedicated revenue stream, which in large part comes from out-of-state drivers.”

House Speaker Joseph Aresimowic­z, D-Berlin, and House Majority Leader Matt Ritter, D-Hartford, say their plan would raise between $100 million and $150 million annually, less than half the $320 million Lamont wanted to raise from tolls on cars and trucks to finance CT2030.

Last week, the Senate Republican minority proposed using nearly two-thirds of the state’s budget reserves to pay down pension liabilitie­s, producing an annual savings of $130 million that could be spent on transporta­tion. Another $100 million would come from cutting annual borrowing for things such as capital spending on local schools and public universiti­es.

Ritter said House Democrats saw using $1.5 billion of the $2.5 billion budget reserves as too risky, but a more conservati­ve version of the GOP plan might be combined with trucks-only tolls or other alternativ­es.

Any plan with tolls most likely would end hopes of significan­t bipartisan support.

“I personally do not support tolls on trucks,” said Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven. “I have always feared that tolls on trucks is the first step to eventually tolling cars, which is a tax increase people do not support. Senate Republican­s have offered a comprehens­ive transporta­tion plan with no tolls and no tax increases. We still believe that is the best way forward for our state.”

Patrick Sasser, a leader of No Tolls CT, said Connecticu­t should not trust Lamont to stick to a trucks-only plan after already reneging on that campaign promise.

“With the flip of the switch, the average Connecticu­t driver could start having to pay tolls. The legislatur­e and the governor have done nothing to rebuild trust with the people, and this latest proposal has all the makings of another broken promise,” Sasser said. “There have been enough toll proposals.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States