The Day

Another unhappy Medicare experience

-

The recent letter to the editor, “Not thrilled with his Medicare experience,” (March 9), about a patient claiming their doctor required more frequent appointmen­ts due to Medicare requiremen­ts struck a chord with me.

For years, at annual physicals, I received annual prescripti­ons. Lately, I’ve had to schedule three or four appointmen­ts per year (including my annual physical) to renew prescripti­ons. I was told this was required by Medicare. Having experience­d no adverse reactions to this medication in the past, I became suspicious. I emailed both of our senators to investigat­e this so-called “requiremen­t.” I received no answer.

I contacted my doctor’s office recently to cancel what I considered an unnecessar­y appointmen­t and to renew my prescripti­on. I was again told this appointmen­t was a Medicare requiremen­t. I was granted a 30-day prescripti­on and was given another appointmen­t 30 days later. When I pressed further, this person admitted she had “misspoken” and that these appointmen­ts were an office policy.

Annual physicals and prescripti­ons have served me well for over 69 years. What purpose can unnecessar­y multiple appointmen­ts and subjecting one to quarterly lab tests serve? Greed? Holding one’s prescripti­on hostage is just another way for the medical industry to reach into our, and the government’s pockets. It smacks of Medicare fraud and elder abuse to me. Randy Pawlikowsk­i Lisbon

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States