The Day

Lamont to region on spike: You figure it out

- DAVID COLLINS d.collins@theday.com

There seems to be no limit to Gov. Ned Lamont’s shabby treatment of eastern Connecticu­t, as he now would allow the region to fend for itself in coping with a worrisome spike in COVID-19 cases here.

This is, after all, the governor who has chosen not to even sit down to negotiate with two of the region’s largest employers, the casino-owning American Indian tribes, on the issues of great importance to them and their thousands of employees: online and sports betting.

It is also the governor who has stiffed the region’s shoreline capital, New London, denying the city any compensati­on or payment in lieu of taxes for the $157 million commercial makeover, to the benefit of rich utilities, the governor is planning for its harbor.

Gov. Lamont turned up in New London this week and announced that he was considerin­g a new executive order — which he signed Tuesday — that would allow municipali­ties like New London and Norwich, facing a spike in COVID-19 cases, to roll back some of the easing of his pandemic restrictio­ns.

This would include continuing old limits on the number of restaurant patrons and attendees at indoor and outdoor events.

Of course, when the biggest number of new cases were concentrat­ed in the western end of the state, in the spring, the governor imposed statewide restrictio­ns that applied to all.

Now that the danger from rising cases is more concentrat­ed in eastern Connecticu­t, the governor is dividing the state for the purposes of rule making.

That geographic distinctio­n may ultimately be good public policy at this stage of the pandemic. Indeed, it’s a big state and one-size-fits-all restrictio­ns may not make sense.

The problem is that the governor is not only allowing a geographic break in rules, he considered for the first time that the responsibi­lity for imposing restrictio­ns lies with municipali­ties, not the state.

He is delegating that responsibi­lity. Now that towns and cities in eastern Connecticu­t are the most at risk, they can decide how to deal with it.

This proposed abdication of responsibi­lity met with immediate resistance from both New London Mayor Michael Passero and Norwich Peter Nystrom, who can both recognize a buck when it’s being passed their way.

And of course they are right to resist this shameful shirking of duty for protecting the public health of eastern Connecticu­t by the governor, a prince of Greenwich.

The mayors are right.

It is not their responsibi­lity to establish pandemic rules to prevent the spread of the disease. They don’t

have the profession­al resources to make the necessary informed decisions.

Orders by the municipali­ties would not carry the weight of those imposed by the state.

More important, the municipal borders of small eastern Connecticu­t communitie­s are porous. Many of us routinely travel across towns, and a risky environmen­t in one town will pose almost the same risk to the next town over.

And why should the mayors of the region’s two principal cities be made to impose restrictio­ns on their own businesses while those in surroundin­g suburban communitie­s get to live by more liberal rules? Not only would it not be effective but it would be grossly unfair.

Residents of eastern Connecticu­t cities wouldn’t be allowed in larger numbers in restaurant­s in their own neighborho­ods but would be pushed into the suburbs instead.

Lamont should do his job as governor of all of Connecticu­t and use the vast resources of state government to chart a course and help us in eastern Connecticu­t, as the pandemic tightens its grip here.

Eastern Connecticu­t has suffered the indifferen­ce of many recent Connecticu­t governors.

It seems Lamont has raised that indifferen­ce to a new level, contempt not only for our economic well-being but also our health.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States