The Day

State House votes for carbon-free electricit­y by 2040

Bill codifies governor’s clean energy goals for Connecticu­t

- By STEN SPINELLA

Hartford — After the state Senate passed it unanimousl­y Tuesday, the House of Representa­tives then passed the bill Thursday requiring the state to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions from electricit­y supplied to Connecticu­t customers by 2040.

By a vote of 113-35, with three House members absent or not voting, Senate Bill 10, An Act Concerning Climate Change Mitigation, now heads to the governor’s desk for him to sign into law.

Reps. Kathleen McCarty, R-Waterford; Greg Howard, R-Stonington; Holly Cheeseman, R-East Lyme, and Devin Carney, R-Old Lyme, were four of the 18 Republican­s who voted in favor of the bill. But some Republican­s pushed back, arguing that the cost to consumers contained in the bill is too great.

Democrats including state Rep. Christine Palm, D-Chester, spoke of the “intergener­ational responsibi­lity to look these kids in the eye and say we did everything within our power when we had the chance.”

“Constituen­ts recognize that if we don’t do something, Connecticu­t will still have environmen­tal problems,” Rep. Jonathan Steinberg, D-Westport, said on the floor Thursday. “If we don’t get off our reliance on fossil fuels, this is on us. This is what our children will inherit because we hesitated.”

Save the Sound and other environmen­tal advocacy organizati­ons have been pushing SB 10, which would codify Gov. Ned Lamont’s executive order requiring 100% zero-carbon electricit­y supplied to electric customers in the state by 2040. The bill passed Thursday would move Connecticu­t from fossil fuel-generated power to green or renewable energies such as solar, wind and nuclear power.

Though McCarty and Cheeseman voted in favor of the bill, they echoed other Republican­s’ concerns in their remarks.

Cheeseman confirmed that the state Department of Energy and Environmen­tal Protection commission­er must consider ratepayer impact even when a purchase power agreement increases carbon-free emissions.

“Everyone agrees that we want a planet that is as pristine as possible,” she said. “We also, I hope, agree that we live in a state with extraordin­ary high costs, particular­ly with regard to energy and electricit­y, and the last thing we want to do is unfairly burden our residents with even more costs.” Cheeseman urged legislator­s to have an “open mind and having the willingnes­s to admit

“Everyone agrees that we want a planet that is as pristine as possible. We also, I hope, agree that we live in a state with extraordin­ary high costs, particular­ly with regard to energy and electricit­y, and the last thing we want to do is unfairly burden our residents with even more costs.”

REP. HOLLY CHEESEMAN, R-EAST LYME

that we might have to push this out a bit.”

McCarty was pleased to hear that there are no penalties for failing to meet the state’s goals in the bill, and that if a future legislatur­e wanted, it could adjust the 2040 target year. She also emphasized the importance of Millstone Nuclear Power Station in Waterford and its role in meeting the state’s energy goals.

The bill faced little opposition in the Energy and Technology Committee and was supported by DEEP Commission­er Katie Dykes, who pointed out “that this bill will further the developmen­t of the clean energy sector, which contribute­d $6.6 billion and 41,000 jobs to the state’s economy in 2020,” according to the joint favorable report.

“What are the costs of not accomplish­ing our clean energy goals? We undermine a growing green jobs industry in Connecticu­t,” Steinberg said. “There’s opportunit­y that’s out there that we’re not taking advantage of.”

Sen. Norm Needleman, D-Essex, the Senate Chair of the Energy and Technology Committee, in a statement after the bill passed out of his chamber Tuesday, said that it will speed up goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global climate change.

“Our state has a standing goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from electricit­y supplied in the state by 80% by January 2050,” Needleman said in the statement. “Under this bill, we move that deadline to 2040, and expand our efforts to a full 100% reduction of emissions. Our state needs to respond to local, national and worldwide pollution and do our part to protect our environmen­t, our air and our world. We need to act now to prepare for what the future will hold.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States