The Day

NYC’s pension funds plagued by inefficien­cies

- By MARTIN Z. BRAUN

New York City’s pension fund system for retired city workers is plagued by ballooning costs stemming from redundanci­es.

The cost to administer benefits to about 340,000 retirees and beneficiar­ies has grown by more than 40% to about $270 million since 2018, according to an analysis of the funds’ financial reports by Bloomberg. A member of the city audit committee brought attention to the funds’ spending and inefficien­cies at a recent meeting.

There’s five retirement funds — one for teachers, nonteachin­g staff, police officers, firefighte­rs and civil servants — and each have separate offices, staff and computer systems. And two of those funds are in the middle of multimilli­on-dollar technology upgrades.

New York pays employees out of one payroll system, but “as soon as they retire, we need five different systems to figure out how to pay them their pension benefit,” said Bud Larson, a former senior city budget official who recommends streamlini­ng operations, at a Jan. 23 city audit committee meeting. Created in 2009, the committee reviews financial statements and approves the city’s hiring of auditors and actuaries.

In 2018, the city’s Independen­t Budget Office estimated that consolidat­ing the five pensions into three, could save $20 million in the first year, and then $41 million two years later. The police and firefighte­r funds, which have similar retirement plans, could merge into one system, IBO said in a report. And employees covered by the fund for school employees, like crossing guards and cafeteria workers, could be transferre­d to the civil servants’ or teachers’ pension.

Last month, New York City Comptrolle­r Brad Lander called on the state’s Department of Financial Services to review the pension fund for schools’ nonteachin­g staff, where spending has grown about 170% in five years. New York City’s Board of Education Retirement System’s $35 million budget exceeds the budget of the police pension, which has almost twice the membership.

In a letter to the State Department of Financial Services responding to Lander, BERS co-chairs Thomas Sheppard and Donald Nesbit said the comptrolle­r’s request of a state review was unwarrante­d. The pension’s budget rose because it moved into new offices and could no longer use technical resources and facilities previously provided by the city’s Department of Education.

“BERS has incurred startup costs the other pension systems have had the ability to spread out over many years,” said the letter emailed to Bloomberg. The co-chairs wrote that calculatin­g benefits for BERS members, many of whom part-time and have several tiers of membership, is more complex and therefore more expensive.

Sheppard emailed the letter to a Bloomberg reporter. Co-chair Nesbit, who cosigned the letter, hung up the phone on the reporter.

Last year, the city contribute­d $9.6 billion to the funds, which have about $250 billion in assets. Employees contribute­d about $2.5 billion, according to the funds’ financial statements.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States