The Day

Can democracy survive if few trust the government it produces?

- PAUL CHOINIERE p.choiniere@yahoo.com Paul Choiniere is the former editorial page editor of The Day, now retired. He can be reached at p.choiniere@yahoo.com.

We have turned into a bunch of cynics. Since 1958 the Pew Research Center has been periodical­ly asking Americans, “How much of the time do you think you can trust the government in Washington to do what is right?”

Back then, during the administra­tion of President Dwight Eisenhower, 73% of Americans said they trusted government to do what is right

“just about always” or “most of the time.” The trust number peaked at 77% in 1964 during the start of the administra­tion of President Lyndon B. Johnson.

The trend has been downward ever since, except for a couple of brief upturns. The last jump in Americans trusting their government came in the wake of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. It was also the last time the trust level was north of 50%, ironic given that the federal government had just failed spectacula­rly in protecting national security.

The trust meter has largely continued its decline since then, through administra­tions and Congresses both Democrat and Republican. It trended down during President Barack Obama’s call for us to “hope” and President Trump’s vow to “make America great again.”

The trust level in government is now 16%.

Was the U.S. government that much more trustworth­y back when we liked Ike or elected LBJ in a landslide following the assassinat­ion of the charismati­c John F. Kennedy? Certainly not. That was a time before freedom of informatio­n allowed citizens to get informatio­n about what their government was up to. It was before the passage of anti-discrimina­tion laws. Objectivel­y speaking, there was probably less reason to trust the government back then.

But the collective attitude toward government was generally sunnier, and there was far less feeding our cynicism.

It was also a time before money came to so dominate politics at the federal level. A time before negative attack ads — depicting your political opponent as sinister, untrustwor­thy and basically a terrible human being — became the standard campaign modus operandi. It was a time before cable networks, radio talk shows and social media ginned up distrust about the opposing faction — be it left or right — to build loyal audiences and generate hits.

Things are at a low point. Heading into the presidenti­al election of 2024, many Americans see the election as not about who has the better policy ideas to move the nation forward but instead about preventing the other guy from winning and destroying our democracy in the process.

Many are fearful — mostly Democrats but not exclusivel­y so — that if former President Donald Trump wins a second term in 2024 our democracy and the institutio­ns that protect it will be seriously endangered. Count me among those folks. The lesson Trump learned from his first term is that if again elected, this time he must bring into his administra­tion only those completely loyal to him, not to the Constituti­on or to some higher ideals of fairness and justice. This time Trump will want a Cabinet willing to use the power of government to crush his political enemies.

But many Republican­s see this as already happening under President Joe Biden. They do not view the arrests of Trump for failing to protect and return classified documents, and for conspiring to defy the will of the voters and remain in office, as necessary actions to hold him accountabl­e. Rather they see Biden using the legal system to try to remove his greatest challenger from the playing field.

They’re wrong, but they believe it fervently, their perspectiv­e fueled by Fox News, right-wing websites and radio talk shows.

The nation is not in a good place when that level of foreboding about the other party precedes an election.

It is hard to see what will reverse this troubling trend. Biden has had significan­t achievemen­ts. During his administra­tion Congress passed laws to cap insulin costs and gave Medicare the power to negotiate, and eventually lower, the cost of many prescripti­on drugs.

The CHIPS and Science Act, which Biden signed into law in August, should increase domestic microchip manufactur­ing, making the nation less dependent on other nations for this critical commodity. Congress, with bipartisan support, approved a desperatel­y needed $1 trillion infrastruc­ture bill. Warnings of a recession have not materializ­ed. Instead, the economy has added 13 million jobs during his administra­tion, including 339,000 jobs in August.

But those achievemen­ts and that job growth is winning Biden few fans or improving the national mood. Biden’s approval rating is stuck hovering around 40%. Real Clear Politics, using an averaging of several polls, finds 68% of Americans see the nation as moving in the wrong direction, only 23% see it as going in the right direction. Concerns about Biden’s age, 80, his frequent gaffes and seeming frailty don’t help his approval ratings. Neither do scenes of migrants pouring over the southern border.

And while unemployme­nt is low at 3.8%, many Americans don’t see their income keeping up with high inflation. When they need to borrow, they are hit with the high inflation rates set in place by the Federal Reserve to attack that inflation. The Day reported on a recent study that concluded one-third of the households here in New London County are in “survival mode.” There is a sense that hard work is not rewarded because there is no getting ahead.

Yet even during times of economic growth and low inflation, the downward trend in trust in government generally continued.

It is healthy to be skeptical of government and questionin­g about it. I made a career of it. But the deep cynicism now in place does not bode well for our democracy. Unfortunat­ely, I can’t foresee what changes the dynamics driving that cynicism.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States