The Day

Hartford set to raise Christian flag over city hall

Banner was at center of Supreme Court controvers­y

- By STEPHEN UNDERWOOD

— Hartford is set Hartford to raise the Christian flag over city hall after a contentiou­s debate over what flags should be flown on city property.

The resolution, introduced by council Democrats, calls for the historical white and blue flag with a red Latin cross to be flown today in observance of Holy Week before Easter Sunday. The flag, designed over a century ago, represents all Christian denominati­ons.

The flag raising comes after Hartford and numerous towns across the state have passed policies restrictin­g what flags can be flown on municipal flagpoles. Strict flag policies, now commonplac­e across Connecticu­t, have sparked controvers­y in several towns over what flags should or should not be flown on municipal property. Several towns have outright banned the Pride flag and the POW/MIA flag while allowing only official government flags to be flown. Proponents of flag policies have said they are necessary to avoid lawsuits.

Hartford opted not to adopt an official policy last year after the U.S. Supreme Court found that the city of Boston violated a private organizati­on’s First Amendment rights by refusing to raise the Christian flag at City Hall, given that they had allowed other flags in the past and that the city did not have a policy in place.

Instead, Hartford’s new flag policy, which was unanimousl­y adopted Monday evening, will allow flags of other nations, flags of sports teams, and flags displayed in conjunctio­n with official events or ceremonies to be flown at city hall. The ordinance does not expressive­ly prohibit religious flags from flying on city property.

While the policy is more inclusive than several other towns in recent years, it still prohibits flag poles as a forum of public expression. Council members are the only ones that can decide what flags can fly.

“That is really the crux of the policy position that was drafted into this,” said the city’s corporatio­n counsel Jonathon Harding. “Our flagpoles are not a forum of public expression, they are a forum of city expression.”

But the decision to fly the Christian flag over city hall was met with some opposition.

Democratic council members who supported the resolution included Council President Shirley Surgeon, Maly Rosado, Marilyn Rossetti, Amilcar Hernandez, Thomas “TJ” Clarke II and Kelly Bilodeau as well as Working Families Party member and pastor Alex Thomas. Working Families Party member Josh

Michtom and John Gale of the Hartford Party both opposed the flag raising.

“We have many Christian organizati­ons that serve the residents of the city, we’re just recognizin­g those organizati­ons and the work they do,” said Surgeon, who co-sponsored the resolution. “We want to show that we recognize them and what they provide to residents of Hartford.”

Other Democrats on the council said that the resolution aligns with the city’s new flag policy.

“It is the prerogativ­e of any council member to put in a resolution to request a flag for city expression,” Hernandez said. “That aligns clearly with the ordinance we passed. Because it is Holy Week, the author of this resolution thought it was a good idea to raise the flag in observance of this week. This still aligns with the ordinance that speaks to flags can be raised in alignment with any ceremonies or events like Holy Week. I don’t see exactly where we could be running into any particular issues.”

But Michtom, who voted against the resolution, said that he believes flying a Christian flag will put the city in legal jeopardy. Under the Supreme Court ruling, a municipali­ty cannot deny another group’s right to fly a flag if other flags are flown, all but ensuring the city must agree to flying other religious flags, according to Michtom.

“As a legal matter, this vote will expose us to lawsuits in the future if another constituen­t requests a different religious flag and we say no. More importantl­y, the separation of church and state is an important value to uphold. The faith of the people and the good works they do within their religious communitie­s don’t need an endorsemen­t from the city, and are, in fact, tarnished by such an endorsemen­t. That endorsemen­t may also have the effect of alienating people of other faiths who are not recognized,” Michtom said.

Councilman Gale, who also opposed the resolution, said that he is concerned flying one religious flag instead of another violates the Constituti­onal rights of other religious groups.

“The very first problem is that the Constituti­on of the United States indicates that Congress should pass no law promoting the establishm­ent of any religion. That First Amendment, like the Supreme Court decision, is applicable to all the states and municipali­ties in those states. Hartford should not be in the business of establishi­ng any religion. Flying a flag of any religion is promoting it. There’s no other reason for flying a flag, except to promote.”

The flag is scheduled to be placed atop city hall today and taken down on Friday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States