The Denver Post

Clinton’s inexcusabl­e disregard for the rules

-

Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 has been justifiabl­y criticized as an error of judgment. What the new report from the State Department inspector general makes clear is that it also was not a casual oversight. Clinton had plenty of warnings to use official government communicat­ions methods, so as to make sure that her records were properly preserved and to minimize cybersecur­ity risks. She ignored them.

The 83-page report declares that “beginning in late 2005 and continuing through 2011,” the department revised its Foreign Affairs Manual and “issued various memoranda specifical­ly discussing the obligation to use Department systems in most circumstan­ces and identifyin­g the risks of not doing so.” Clinton didn’t.

During her tenure, State Department employees were told that they were expected to use approved, secure methods to transmit informatio­n that was sensitive but unclassifi­ed, or SBU. If they needed to transmit SBU informatio­n outside the department’s network, they were told to ask informatio­n specialist­s for help. The report said there is no evidence that Clinton ever asked, “despite the fact that e-mails exchanged on her personal account regularly contained informatio­n that was marked as SBU.” On June 28, 2011, a cable was sent to all diplomatic and consular posts over her signature warning that personal e-mail accounts could be compromise­d and officials should “avoid conducting official Department business from your personal e-mail accounts.” At the time, Clinton was doing exactly that.

On March 11, 2011, an assistant secretary sent a memo on cybersecur­ity threats directly to Clinton, noting a “dramatic increase” in attempts to compromise personal e-mail accounts of senior department officials, possibly for spying or blackmail. That didn’t stop Clinton, either. There were also numerous notificati­ons that some e-mails (but not all) are considered federal records under the law and that she should print and file those in her office and, before leaving office, surrender all e-mails dealing with department business. She did so only about two years later, in December 2014.

Clinton breezed through all the warnings and notificati­ons. While not illegal behavior, it was disturbing­ly unmindful of the rules. We urge the FBI to finish its own investigat­ion soon, so all informatio­n about this troubling episode will be before the voters.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States