The Denver Post

Neighborho­od concerns being brushed o≠ in OK of Park Hill restaurant

- By Eric Maurer Eric Maurer is a Park Hill resident. He has worked for a decade to drive the adoption of clean energy technologi­es. To learn more, visit www.loveliving­denver.com.

You don’t have to look far in Denver to get a glimpse of new constructi­on. It is everywhere, and it is transformi­ng communitie­s before our eyes. All of this constructi­on creates new jobs and moderates rent increases, but it also comes at a cost.

We are losing the diversity and charm of our favorite communitie­s. And our political institutio­ns have tipped the scales so far toward developers that it is almost impossible for a community to preserve what it cherishes.

I live in Park Hill, just east of City Park, and adjacent to a one-block retail center on Kearney Street at 23rd Avenue. If you know this block or even this neighborho­od, you might describe it as safe, quaint and charming. It was not always this way. Many of my neighbors are personally responsibl­e for Kearney Street’s success. The same neighbors who petitioned the city to move its airport also planted our trees and helped recruit the right businesses.

Now this thriving block and neighborho­od are under siege.

Kevin Settles, an Idaho businessma­n, wants to bring his Bardenay distillery-restaurant chain to our block. At first this sounded great. Another walkable dinner choice was coming to Kearney, what could be better? Then we learned more.

The facility will seat 236 people. That’s 2.5 times the largest restaurant on the block. It’s nearly the equivalent of stuffing a Cheesecake Factory into our residentia­l “Main Street.”

Once neighbors contemplat­ed the scale of this operation, the questions started flowing. What about parking, safety, traffic, noise, property values, effects on other locally owned businesses?

The neighbors organized to influence the liquor license process. They submitted letters, signed petitions, and even spoke at the hearing. Neverthele­ss, Denver’s liquor licensing board recommende­d the license, brushing aside neighbor concerns.

To make matters worse, to date, the board has not responded to e-mails related to impropriet­ies in Settles’ process to collect signatures that supported Bardenay’s liquor license applicatio­n. The polling firm working for Settles is required to stay neutral when soliciting neighbor signatures. It did not.

The firm knocked on my door, but did not even ask about our reasons for not supporting the license. Yet the firm stated on the record that it had done this. In another instance, the firm’s representa­tives sought to convince a neighbor to sign by name-dropping others who had already signed.

Settles, for his part, did grant a community meeting with neighbors. Whether intentiona­lly or not, the meeting actually happened after the liquor license had been recommende­d. Settles seemed open to listening to community questions, but offered few commitment­s or solutions to address them.

After the meeting, a neighbor followed up with Settles. Would he sign a “good neighbor agreement”? This is an agreement that is legally binding and stipulates measures the owner must take to stay in good standing. Settles’ answer: no thanks. This despite Bardenay’s website proclaimin­g that its “success depends upon the goodwill of the communitie­s in which it operates.”

Outside of the liquor licensing process, we are not entirely sure why more scrutiny did not occur during the zoning or permitting processes. We can only speculate that these processes are so rules-based they fail to live up to their own principles and are incapable of incorporat­ing relevant neighborho­od context and feedback.

In sharing this story with you, I do not seek to imply that the right answer is to throw out Bardenay and preclude new developmen­t. The issue is more nuanced than that.

We seek transparen­t and fact-based developmen­t processes. Right now, it’s too easy for Settles to cast aside community questions and speed through zoning, licensing, permitting and constructi­on. As neighbors and citizens, we desire a different model. We understand our responsibi­lity is to organize ourselves, and we accept that. But our political institutio­ns must do a better job to carve out space in the developmen­t process that recognizes our voices and ideas.

As for Park Hill and Bardenay, our story hasn’t been written. We seek to work with Settles. And we will never stop fighting for our neighborho­od, even when the decisions of others predetermi­ne our community’s vision without our basic input.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States