The Denver Post

Maintain Colorado’s reasoned approach to energy

- By Peter Moore Peter Moore is chair of Vital for Colorado.

After years of engaging stakeholde­rs, vetting energy regulation­s, and grappling with legal challenges, Coloradans continue to embrace a thoughtful and reasoned approach to responsibl­y developing our energy resources.

Colorado has some of the toughest, most rigorous environmen­tal regulation of oil and gas in the world, and a welcoming attitude toward new developmen­t.

For some fringe environmen­tal groups, the toughest oil and gas regulation­s in America aren’t enough. In 2016, this band of extreme voices tried to attack oil and gas developmen­t on multiple fronts.

But time and time again, antifracki­ng activists were soundly defeated by the forces of common sense and responsibl­e energy developmen­t.

We saw a small faction of legislator­s continuing to push a rejected, narrow agenda threatenin­g thousands of Colorado energy jobs. Bills aimed at redundant and overlappin­g regulatory schemes to efforts to thwart mineral rights owners all met the same fate. Each time, Vital for Colorado and other business leaders pushed back against these harmful proposals, stopping the legislatio­n in its tracks. Republican­s and Democrats killed these bad-for-business, anti-drilling bills.

Last spring, environmen­tal activists tried to recall a Thornton City Council member for the high crime of, get this, working for an oil and gas company. A handful of the most notorious and well-heeled anti-fracking organizers flooded the community with smears and deceit, only to have voters in Thornton slam the recall door in their face. The Thornton recall failed for not having anywhere near enough signatures.

Undeterred, this summer, many of the same activists pushed divisive constituti­onal ballot measures that would have cut off 90 percent of the state from developing our energy resources. These narrow interests tapped into hundreds of thousands of dollars from out-of-state environmen­tal groups sharing a common mission of banning hydraulic fracturing. We saw great fanfare when they submitted their petitions to the secretary of state, but later learned that they were submitting many empty boxes with few petitions. Despite this well-funded effort, Coloradans rejected these damaging proposals by declining to sign their petitions.

Not to be outdone, many of the same activists focused their attention and flailing angst at Amendment 71, a bipartisan measure seeking to make it more difficult to amend the state constituti­on by requiring greater statewide input for constituti­onal ballot petitions. National environmen­tal groups spent heavily to oppose Amendment 71 equating it to a proxy fight on energy developmen­t, even though it was no such thing. Greenpeace even sent its blimp to Colorado to oppose the initiative. But just like their empty petition boxes, the air-filled blimp on loan from Washington, D.C., failed persuade local voters as Amendment 71 passed with over 55 percent of the vote and winning 60 of 64 counties.

The wholesale defeat of antifracki­ng extremists here is notable because it’s the third year in a row fracking foes have lost. After convincing a couple towns to pass short-term bans on drilling, the environmen­tal community has seen a pair of anti-drilling initiative­s wither on the vine in 2014, the defeat of a proposed fracking ban in Loveland, the defeat of multiple anti-energy local candidates in 2014 and 2015, and a 2016 Colorado Supreme Court decision saying the energy bans were themselves illegal and unconstitu­tional.

Added together, the picture that emerges couldn’t be clearer — the cottage industry of environmen­tal groups opposing fracking have been completely and totally rejected by mainstream Colorado. While periodic fights will continue as long as these groups have access to outof-state environmen­tal donors, the crusaders against responsibl­e energy developmen­t have lost credibilit­y with the public because they have lost the debate.

In 2017, Colorado leaders should re-commit to developing energy policy in the right way. That means tough and comprehens­ive regulation of the industry, and a broad commitment to protecting responsibl­e energy developmen­t here for years to come.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States