The Denver Post

Hawkins’ latest fails to thrill

- By Maureen Corrigan

What made Paula Hawkins’ 2015 debut “The Girl on the Train” such a success? The novel’s plot— about marital infidelity and its homicidal consequenc­es— was the standard stuff of psychologi­cal suspense fiction. But Hawkins’s distinctiv­e zigzag storytelli­ng style helped sell 20 million copies worldwide and turned the novel into a (so-so) Hollywood movie.

Hawkins’ heroine, Rachel, rides on a suburban commuter train every day past the same house and watches the same couple breakfasti­ng on their deck — until the day something about that scene changes — and then changes again and again. Hawkins’ technique as a thriller writer is similar to the “KonMari method” of clothes-folding pioneered by Japanese organizing mavenMarie Kondo. Her short chapters ingeniousl­y double back on themselves in much the sameway a drawer of sweaters, neatened up by Kondo, are pleated and flattened to accordions­harp perfection. At last, everything slots into place.

Now Hawkins is back with a second thriller, “Into theWater.” Many of the elements that helped propel “The Girl on the Train” are present here: a vivid setting and a collection of unreliable narrators who tell variations on a single tale, adding a curious detail here, contradict­ing a crucial point there.

But something’s amiss in this second novel: It’s stagnant rather than suspensefu­l. “The Girl on the Train” may have rumbled back and forth on the same train tracks twice a day, but at least it moved; as a thriller, “Into theWater” is stuck in the mud.

Hawkins’ story opens with a young woman named Jules Abbott, who has just been summoned to her older sister Nel’s house by two police officers. That house, located in a small town in the north of England, is the family homestead, although it’s easy to see why Jules fled after she reached adulthood. The place sits so close to a river that it seems on the verge of toppling into the foul water below. Here’s how Jules describes the view from the kitchen window:

“So beautiful, everyone remarked upon the view, but they didn’t really see. They never opened the window and leaned out, they never looked down at the wheel, rotting where it stood, they never looked past the sunlight playing on the water’s surface, they never saw what the water really was, greenish-black and filled with living things and dying things.”

Nel’s corpse has been found in the Drowning Pool, a notorious spot beneath a cliff that she has been obsessivel­y photograph­ing. Nel was researchin­g the history of local women who died in the Drowning Pool— some were suicides, others met their oblivion unwillingl­y. The first known drowning was that of Libby Seeton, a young girl who was accused of witchcraft. She was fatally dunked in the river in the autumn of 1679. Other victims include poor Anne Ward, whose husband returned fromWorldW­ar I a violent man; and, just recently, Katie Whittaker, a close school friend of Nel’s 15-year-old daughter, Lena.

An old woman named Nickie Sage (as her name rather too bluntly indicates) is the local soothsayer: “People turned a blind eye. … No one liked to think about the fact that the water in that river was infected with the blood and bile of persecuted women, unhappy women; they drank it every day.”

Into this murk wades Jules. She’d been estranged from Nel for years, but now she assumes guardiansh­ip of her angry and devastated niece, Lena, and begins investigat­ing her older sister’s mysterious drowning. Suspects begin to hatch like mayflies here: There’s the handsome high school teacher, the nasty retired policeman along with his peculiarly doting daughter-in-law, and Katie Whittaker’s grief-racked mother, who irrational­ly blames Nel for her daughter’s death. These characters, along with almost everyone else Jules meets in this damp burgh, tell their own versions of the truth, tainted by mold and malice.

In “The Girl on the Train,” Hawkins ingeniousl­y created a situation where an emotionall­y stuck heroine is jolted back to life in the course of her daily rides past a landscape that alters radically. In “Into theWater,” however, Hawkins’ stock townspeopl­e circle round and round the Drowning Pool, whose sinister nature has remained static for centuries. The revelation­s about her sister’s life and death produce but a ripple in Jules’ day-to-day life.

“Into theWater” is a dull disappoint­ment of a thriller; one good flush would put everybody— characters and readers alike— out of their misery.

 ?? Matt Dunham, The Associated Press ?? Paula Hawkins in London in 2015.
Matt Dunham, The Associated Press Paula Hawkins in London in 2015.
 ??  ?? Into the Water By Paula Hawkins (Riverhead)
Into the Water By Paula Hawkins (Riverhead)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States