The Denver Post

Keurig aims to have eco-A-OK-cup by ’20

The creator of the single-serve coffee machines will make its plastic more lucrative to recyclers.

- By Thomas Heath

The K-cup that sparks so many millions of coffee drinkers to life each morning is appealing to eco-conscious consumers — just as the market for its Cup of Joe appears to be cooling.

Keurig Green Mountain said it plans by 2020 to change the plastic compositio­n in the billions of K-cup single-serving coffee containers it sells annually, making them more lucrative to recyclers while removing one of the nagging complaints that the little pods are piling up in landfills.

“Our goal is 100 percent Keurig K-cup pods diverted from landfills by curbside recycling,” said Monique Oxender, the coffee brewer’s chief sustainabi­lity officer. “The consumer is going to brew it, peel and empty it, and pop the pod into the recycling bin in the same behavior they would do with a yogurt cup. We want to make it a habit.”

The recycling breakthrou­gh comes as the Keurig’s single-serve coffee machines, which helped revolution­ize coffee consumptio­n, are becoming less of a habit after years of growth. There were 23 million Keurig machines in North American homes by September, according to the firm.

According to analysts, growth in the Kcup market has stalled as Vermont-based Keurig loses market share. “If it is going to be easier to recycle K-cups, some consumers will care and that may or may not affect demand,” said Pablo Zuanic, an analyst with Susquehann­a Internatio­nal Group. “I don’t think it’s going to move the needle. The bigger issue for Keurig is that there are not enough affordable Keurig machines, and so volume is not growing much.”

The company’s model has shifted from manufactur­ing pods that contain its own brand to making pods for brands such as Starbucks and Dunkin’ Donuts, which is known as co-packing. Co-packing for others is a lower-margin business.

Keurig was founded in Massachuse­tts in 1992. Its first machines, known as brewers, launched in 1998 and targeted the office market. Home brewers began selling in 2004.

Keurig has been knocked for the billions of recycle-resistant K-cup pods it sells. A Keurig spokespers­on said the company sold 10.5 billion K-cups for the fiscal year ending in September 2015, which is the last year of public data before the company was taken private in a $13.9 billion buyout by

JAB Holding Co. JAB is an investment firm managing the money for Germany’s Reimann family. The family’s portfolio also includes stakes in England’s Reckitt Benckiser consumer goods company, the Coty fragrance firm and the Jimmy Choo luxury shoe brand.

Keurig was struggling with declining sales when JAB announced it was acquiring the firm in December 2015. Part of JAB’s strategy was to use Keurig technology and its dominance of the U.S. market to become “the Bud(weiser) of the coffee space,” said Zuanic at the time, according to the Wall Street Journal.

It would also be a hedge by JAB against European rivals such as Nestle, the largest packaged-coffee company in the world.

But the company has not yet delivered on its growth, with analysts citing a lack of innovation and affordabil­ity. Zuanic said the company needs to lower the cost of the brewers to below $79, enticing more buyers. He also said the machines have failed to become smaller, faster and quieter.

The company is preparing to deliver the knockout punch to its critics in the sustainabi­lity world.

The problem with K-cups is twofold. First, they have been too small for the sorting machines to “see” and move to the recycling line instead of the garbage heap. Second, the material compositio­n of the K-cup plastic did not lend itself to being broken down and reused as another material.

Many of the 600 or so recycling plants across the United States and Canada have reinvested in technology that can spot the K-cup pods. In a series of tests that Oxender termed “mythbustin­g,” 90 percent of Keurig K-cups were sorted appropriat­ely.

Also, Oxender said Keurig is changing the makeup of its K-cups from polystyren­e to polypropyl­ene. “What we have found is, with (polystyren­e), there’s not a lot of value to it,” he said. “In the good versus bad, it’s determined by market value. If it’s plastic that can be made into something new, it has higher value.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States