The Denver Post

Study: $15 wage cost jobs

Seattle law took effect in 2015; report also found a 9% cut in hours

- By The Associated Press

seattle» Seattle’s $15-anhour minimum wage law has cost the city jobs, according to a study released Monday that contradict­ed another new study published last week.

A University of Washington team studying the law’s effects found that the law has boosted pay in low-wage jobs since it took effect in 2015, but that it also caused a 9 percent reduction in hours worked, The Seattle Times reported. For an average low-wage Seattle worker, that’s a loss of about $125 per month, the study said.

“If you’re a low-skilled worker with one of those jobs, $125 a month is a sizable amount of money,” said Mark Long, one of the authors. “It can be the difference between being able to pay your rent and not being able to pay your rent.”

There would be about 5,000 more low-wage jobs in the city without the law, the study estimated.

Seattle was one of the first U.S. cities to adopt a $15 minimum wage law, and its experience is being closely watched as other cities have followed suit and as advocates push for a higher federal minimum wage. The city’s law is raising the minimum to $15 for all businesses by 2021.

In the years covered by the study, 2015 and 2016, the minimum wage was at most $13, depending on business size, worker benefits and tips. The current minimum wage in Seattle ranges from $11 to $15, and unemployme­nt is at a historical­ly low 2.6 percent, thanks in part to the booming tech sector. Seattle has added about 40,000 jobs overall in the last few years.

Last week, a review by University of California at Berkeley economists found the law raised pay without hurting jobs in the restaurant industry. An author of that report, Michael Reich, criticized the University of Washington team’s methodolog­y.

The University of Washington effort compared economic data from Seattle with economic data from other parts of Washington state — a statistica­l model referred to as “synthetic Seattle” — for which economic trend lines were previously similar to Seattle. By comparing the “synthetic Seattle” where no minimum wage increase took effect with Seattle itself, the researcher­s tried to figure out the minimum wage law’s effect on Seattle’s economy.

But Reich took issue with how the University of Washington team compiled its “synthetic Seattle.” It was based on areas that “do not at all resemble Seattle,” Reich warned in a letter to the city Monday .

By contrast, the Berkeley study compared Seattle to a statistica­l model based on areas around the country — not just within the state — and was thus a “more representa­tive” comparison, he said.

The University of Washington report excludes “multisite businesses,” such as large corporatio­ns, restaurant­s and retail stores that own their branches directly. Single-site businesses, though — which are counted in the report — could include franchise locations that are owned separately from their corporate headquarte­rs.

Reich said multisite businesses employ a large percentage of Seattle’s low-paid workers. That meant workers who left single-site businesses to work at multisite businesses were counted as job losses, not job gains in the UW study, he said.

Jacob Vigdor, a public policy professor and one of the authors of the new report, stood by the team’s findings. He noted that his team’s study actually corroborat­ed Berkeley’s conclusion, finding zero impact from the minimum-wage law on restaurant employment — when taking into account jobs at all wage levels within the restaurant industry.

 ??  ?? Signs are displayed below Seattle City Hall, right, and the Columbia Center building, left, after the City Council passed the minimum wage law in 2014. Ted S. Warren, Associated Press file
Signs are displayed below Seattle City Hall, right, and the Columbia Center building, left, after the City Council passed the minimum wage law in 2014. Ted S. Warren, Associated Press file

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States