North Carolina avoids academic violations after long investigation.

Infractions panel “could not conclude” there were violations

North Carolina can move forward, closing one of the most embarrassing chapters in the school’s history now that the longrunning NCAA academic case has ended with UNC facing no penalty.

Still, even with what had to be the best possible outcome — a weight being lifted that has loomed over the Chapel Hill campus for years — school officials greeted the news more with cautious relief than exuberance.

“This isn’t a time of celebration,” chancellor Carol Folt said Friday in a conference call with reporters.

The NCAA said an infractions committee panel determined it “could not conclude” there were academic violations by the school in the scandal focused on irregular courses featuring significant athlete enrollments.

The school had faced five serious charges — including lack of institutional control — and the possibility of major sanctions such as postseason bans or vacated wins and championships. Yet the case full of starts, stops and twice-rewritten charges reached a best-case-scenario conclusion with the panel’s Friday report.

“I think it’s important to understand the panel was in no way supporting what happened,” said Southeastern Conference commissioner Greg Sankey, the panel’s chief hearing officer. “What happened was troubling. And I think that’s been acknowledged by many different parties. But the panel applied the membership’s bylaws to the fact.

“Albeit at times positions shifted and we were skeptical of positions taken, the panel couldn’t conclude violations. That’s reality.”

Ultimately, the panel said it found only two violations: a failure-to-cooperate charge against two people tied to the problem courses in the formerly named African and Afro-American Studies department, or AFAM.

Former AFAM chairman Julius Nyang’oro faces a five-year show-cause penalty through 2022 in what amounts to the sole penalty imposed in the case. Nyang’oro had refused to interview with NCAA investigators after the case was reopened in 2014.

The other person, retired AFAM office administrator Deborah Crowder, initially refused interviews but reconsidered and interviewed with NCAA investigators in May as well as attended the school’s hearing with the panel in August. Crowder — who had enrolled students, distributed assignments and graded many of the papers in the courses — was not punished, but the NCAA said it is making note of her initial lack of cooperation.

Elliot Abrams, Crowder’s attorney, said in a statement the ruling affirms her account that she treated all students equally. Bill Thomas, Nyang’oro’s attorney, declined to comment.

North Carolina also faced an improperbenefits charge tied to athlete access to the problem courses, while former professor and academic counselor for women’s basketball Jan Boxill was charged with providing improper help on assignments.

Michael L. Buckner, a Florida attorney who has worked on compliance cases, called it “a best-case scenario” for UNC.