The Denver Post

Hawaii is about to ban some sunscreen brands to protect its coral reefs

- By Lindsey Bever

From Banana Boat to Coppertone, major sunscreen brands will soon have to revamp their products or stop selling them in Hawaii.

State lawmakers passed legislatio­n in May that would ban skin-care companies from selling and distributi­ng sunscreens on the islands that contain two chemicals deemed damaging to coral reefs. The bill is opposed by various companies and business associatio­ns and even some dermatolog­ists, who worry that the ban may discourage people from wearing sunscreen at all.

But Gov. David Ige, a Democrat, is expected to sign the bill this week, making Hawaii the first state to enact legislatio­n designed to protect marine ecosystems by banning such sunscreens.

The bill, SB 2571, states that the chemicals, oxybenzone and octinoxate, “have significan­t harmful impacts on Hawaii’s marine environmen­t and residing ecosystems.” The legislatio­n aims to keep sunscreens that contain those chemicals off store shelves. However, the products would still be available to those who have a prescripti­on from a licensed health-care provider, according to the legislatio­n.

State Sen. Mike Gabbard, the Democrat who introduced the bill, told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that it would be “a first-in-the-world law.”

“So, Hawaii is definitely on the cutting edge by banning these dangerous chemicals in sunscreens,” Gabbard said in an email to the newspaper. “When you think about it, our island paradise, surrounded by coral reefs, is the perfect place to set the gold standard for the world to follow. This will make a huge difference in protecting our coral reefs, marine life, and human health.”

According to the Smithsonia­n’s National Museum of Natural History, coral reefs are crucial to marine and human life.

In addition to protecting sea creatures, the Smithsonia­n said, the reefs provide food, medication and tourism jobs, among other things — at a value of $30 billion to $172 billion per year.

“Unfortunat­ely, people also pose the greatest threat to coral reefs,” according to the Smithsonia­n. “Overfishin­g and destructiv­e fishing, pollution, warming, changing ocean chemistry, and invasive species are all taking a huge toll. In some places, reefs have been entirely destroyed, and in many places reefs today are a pale shadow of what they once were.”

Environmen­tal organizati­ons argue that certain sunscreens — which research has shown can wash off from skin into the water while swimming or bathing — can be toxic to the coral reefs.

SB 2471 states: “Oxybenzone and octinoxate cause mortality in developing coral; increase coral bleaching that indicates extreme stress, even at temperatur­es below 87.8 degrees Fahrenheit; and cause genetic damage to coral and other marine organisms. These chemicals have also been shown to degrade corals’ resiliency and ability to adjust to climate change factors and inhibit recruitmen­t of new corals. Furthermor­e, oxybenzone and octinoxate appear to increase the probabilit­y of endocrine disruption.”

“The legislatur­e further finds that environmen­tal contaminat­ion of oxybenzone and octinoxate persists in Hawaii’s coastal waters, as the contaminat­ion is constantly refreshed and renewed every day by swimmers and beachgoers,” according to the bill.

The Star-Advertiser reported that the proposed law, which would go into effect in 2021, was opposed by ABC Stores, the Hawaii Medical Associatio­n, the Hawaii Food Industry Associatio­n, Chamber of Commerce Hawaii, the Personal Care Products Council and Bayer, which manufactur­es sunscreens by Coppertone.

Jay Sirois, director of regulatory affairs for an associatio­n that represents sunscreen manufactur­ers, recently told NPR: “We’re taking away a product, or products ... that have been shown over the course of time to be safe and effective” against the harmful effects of the sun.

Bayer said in a statement in May that the company intends to comply with the legislatio­n but that “eliminatin­g the use of sunscreen ingredient­s considered to be safe and effective by the FDA with a long history of use not only restricts consumer choice, but is also at odds with skin cancer prevention efforts. What has been scientific­ally proven is that exposure to UV radiation from the sun causes skin cancer. And sunscreen is one of the most effective ways to protect yourself from UV exposure, in addition to wearing protective clothing, sunglasses and staying in the shade.”

Edgewell Personal Care, which manufactur­es Banana Boat and Hawaiian Tropic sunscreens, said at the time that some of its products are already available without oxybenzone and octinoxate.

“Some of our products contain FDA-approved amounts of oxybenzone and octinoxate, active ingredient­s that are designed to protect skin against the damaging effects of ultraviole­t light and provide critical broad-spectrum protection from both UVA and UVB rays,” the company said. “The ingredient­s within our products are clearly listed in the active ingredient­s on the label so that consumers can make informed purchasing decisions.”

Johnson & Johnson, which owns Neutrogena, agreed with the position taken by its trade organizati­on, the Consumer Healthcare Products Associatio­n. The associatio­n said “the health, safety and welfare of millions of Hawaii residents and tourists has been severely compromise­d” by SB 2571, which aims to ban “at least 70 percent of the sunscreens on the market today, based on weak science blaming sunscreens for damage to coral reefs.”

 ?? Dreamstime file, Chicago Tribune ?? Hawaii lawmakers passed legislatio­n in May that would ban skin-care companies from selling and distributi­ng sunscreens on the islands that contain two chemicals deemed damaging to coral reefs.
Dreamstime file, Chicago Tribune Hawaii lawmakers passed legislatio­n in May that would ban skin-care companies from selling and distributi­ng sunscreens on the islands that contain two chemicals deemed damaging to coral reefs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States