The Denver Post

An opportunit­y to keep Colo.’s wild lands wild

-

There’s a small, rapidly closing window of opportunit­y for pristine wilderness lands in southweste­rn Colorado to be protected, but it’ll take support from Republican lawmakers to slip the legislatio­n through during this lame duck period following the midterms.

For years Colorado lawmakers have attempted to pass a version of the San Juan Mountains Wilderness Act. And as the Senate compiles a package of land bills to pass as omnibus legislatio­n, there’s a chance it could finally get done.

The areas in question include important drinking water watersheds, animal habitats, peaks that soar above 14,000 feet and the type of unblemishe­d wilderness that has itself become an endangered specimen.

Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet re-introduced legislatio­n this year to designate several strategica­lly selected parcels of land — that together total 61,000 acres in southwest Colorado — as wilderness. That designatio­n is the greatest protection available for our public lands.

But in order for Bennet’s San Juan Mountains Wilderness Act to get absorbed into a package of land bills that are likely to pass in the next few weeks, Republican Sen. Cory Gardner needs to sign onto the legislatio­n.

The bill is currently in the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and Gardner is a member of that committee. While that doesn’t guarantee the legislatio­n will pass, Gardner’s support would go a long way.

Gardner’s office told us he supports the effort behind the bill but has concerns. Rep. Scott Tipton, R-Cortez, has concerns too, his office says. All of the public lands in question are in Tipton’s congressio­nal district.

We certainly don’t want to make light of those concerns, but this is a rare opportunit­y to pass a very good bill, that has made significan­t strides toward becoming perfect.

Concerns about water rights in the area have been completely addressed according to the Colorado River District.

The last remaining opposition to reducing the uses allowed on these lands comes from three organizati­ons: the Colorado OffHighway Vehicle Coalition, the Trail Preservati­on Alliance and the Colorado Snowmobile Associatio­n.

Scott Jones, president of the OHVC, says that while access to existing recreation­al trails used by motorized vehicles will be preserved, restrictio­ns on trail maintenanc­e will make it prohibitiv­ely difficult to manage the trails and keep them open for generation­s to come.

What’s the point in having wilderness areas if no one can enjoy them for recreation? (Jones also made some fair quips about the federal government’s problems keeping forests healthy).

But as population growth, tourist intrusions, and economic developmen­t pressures from oil and gas, mining and housing continue to mount, the West must get increasing­ly aggressive about protecting our remaining wild places.

These places are worthy of our protection: the soaring peaks north of Telluride in the Mount Sneffels Wilderness Area; the Sheep Mountain Special Management Area, which is the largest undevelope­d roadless area that is not designated wilderness lands; the McKenna Peak Wilderness in Dolores County; and the Naturita Canyon in San Miguel County.

Now is the time to pass this legislatio­n and preserve these crucial habitats for animals and protect these secluded public lands for recreation­al use. Members of The Denver Post’s editorial board are Megan Schrader, editor of the editorial pages; Lee Ann Colacioppo, editor; Justin Mock, CFO; Bill Reynolds, vice president of circulatio­n and production; Bob Kinney, vice president of informatio­n technology; and TJ Hutchinson, systems editor.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States