The Denver Post

Protect Colo.’s disabled population

-

Three years have passed since it first became apparent that Colorado’s 20 nonprofit providers of care for thousands of individual­s with developmen­tal disabiliti­es were vulnerable to mismanagem­ent and graft.

A long-overdue audit of the systems released last week is dishearten­ing.

Colorado Auditor Dianne Ray’s team repeatedly found that individual­s weren’t receiving the services required by state and federal law, and in other instances, funds earmarked for supporting disabled individual­s living independen­tly in the community were diverted to other programs despite a large wait list.

However, it should also be noted Ray didn’t report any out-right misdeeds, missing money or abuse.

So what do we do now with news that these Community-centered Boards are falling short of administer­ing nearly $200 million in public funds in adherence with federal and state guidance?

The answer is more oversight from the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, and more oversight from the public.

In 2016, lawmakers responded to concerns that one care provider — Rocky Mountain Human Services had misspent large sums of money, including a $437,000 salary for its director — by requiring the entities to receive financial and performanc­e audits from the state.

But also that year, lawmakers considered requiring the Community-centered Boards to be subject to the Colorado Open Records Act. They failed to take that step, and we still feel that was a mistake. These nonprofits are running almost exclusivel­y on taxpayer money and they should be subject to intense scrutiny.

“We need a better way to manage these contracts so more money and services get to the individual­s who have the disabiliti­es,” Maureen Welch told The Denver Post’s Christophe­r Osher.

Welch is an advocate for the developmen­tally and intellectu­ally disabled, and she described a system where clients and their families are too afraid to speak up when they have concerns about how the non-profits are operating.

For example, 19 of the 20 nonprofits were not meeting basic state requiremen­ts for case management according to a press release from the state auditor.

“This included not monitoring the services that were being provided to recipients, not updating their service plans and not documentin­g case management activities,” according to the press release. “Auditors also found instances where some program recipients were not receiving the services outlined in their service plans, which could put their health, safety, and ability to remain independen­t at risk.”

Transparen­cy would make it easier for the public to track where public dollars are being allocated. One of the most concerning parts of the audit detailed how at least $2.5 million earmarked for supported living services were spent on other programs, despite waitlists for those independen­t living programs ranging from 130 to 206 individual­s.

This audit, on top of serious issues found in 2015 and 2016 by the Denver City Auditor, tells us that is not happening. Colorado lawmakers have another chance in 2019 to crack down on these nonprofits and require more of them and better for vulnerable Colorado residents.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States