The Denver Post

Perspectiv­e: Protect the Grand Canyon from uranium mining.

- By Cindy McCain and Mark Udall

Every year, Americans of all political persuasion­s make pilgrimage­s to Grand Canyon National Park, which will mark its 100th anniversar­y on Feb. 26. They stand in awe at the rim of this natural wonder, grateful for the forebears who preserved it for generation­s — and, for the most part, unaware that the Grand Canyon isn’t nearly as protected as people think it is.

The clock is ticking on a 20year ban on new mining claims on about 1 million acres of public land surroundin­g the national park. Thousands of uranium claims were put on hold in 2012 because of mounting evidence that uranium mining in the headwaters of Grand Canyon creeks can contaminat­e life-giving seeps and springs in the desert basins below.

After examining evidence of harmful effects, five federal agencies recommende­d the temporary halt to new uranium claims. Ken Salazar, then the interior secretary, said his precaution­ary decision would allow more time to assess the impacts of active and abandoned mines, adding, “We have chosen a responsibl­e path that makes sense for this and future generation­s.”

This week, the Senate voted 92 to 8 to approve the Natural Resources Management Act. Among other things, it protects Yellowston­e National Park from mining on adjacent public lands.

Though the bill doesn’t benefit the canyon, this burst of bipartisan­ship bodes well for Grand Canyon National Park as it approaches its 100th birthday. It’s time for the new Congress to reach across the aisle and carry on our long bipartisan tradition of stewardshi­p for this crown jewel of our national park system.

It was a Republican president, Theodore Roosevelt, who first proclaimed the Grand Canyon a national monument in 1908. After bipartisan votes in both houses, President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, signed the bill establishi­ng the Grand Canyon as a national park in 1919. A half-century later, Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater of Arizona introduced the bill that nearly doubled the size of Grand Canyon National Park, while returning about 188,000 acres of aboriginal home- land to the Havasupai Tribe. Arizona congressma­n Mo Udall, a liberal Democrat, helped unite bipartisan support for the Grand Canyon Enlargemen­t Act, and Republican President Gerald Ford signed it into law in 1975.

Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain later teamed up with Udall and others in cosponsori­ng the Grand Canyon Protection Act in 1992, one of the last laws that Udall signed on to before retiring. McCain subsequent­ly thanked “my friend Mo Udall” for being “a strong protector of the pristine beauty of the Grand Canyon and our other national parks.”

The people living closest to the canyon are fervent in supporting the mining ban. Ninety-six percent of Arizonans agree that keeping public lands and waters healthy benefits the Arizona economy and quality of life. And nearly two-thirds support the ban on new uranium claims around the Grand Canyon, including 56 percent of Republican­s, 67 percent of independen­ts and 69 percent of Democrats.

In particular, the Havasupai people — who live at the bottom of the canyon and whose sole source of regularly accessible water is at risk — want to permanentl­y ban uranium mining. They are joined by Hopi, Navajo, Hualapai, Zuni and other tribal nations in opposing the desecratio­n of their homeland.

Now is the time to protect the Grand Canyon’s sacred waters from permanent uranium-mining pollution.

Let’s challenge all of America’s elected officials to become better caretakers not only of the Grand Canyon but also of all public lands. In this new Congress, let’s sit down and see what we can do — together — to permanentl­y ban uranium mining around the Grand Canyon as our gift to the next generation. Let’s carry the tradition of bipartisan stewardshi­p into the Grand Canyon’s next century.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States