The Denver Post

Progressiv­e Democrats deceived Colorado voters

- By Mark Hillman Mark Hillman served as Senate majority leader and state treasurer. To read more or comment, go to MarkHillma­n.com.

The brazen cutthroat attack by “progressiv­e” Democrats against Colorado’s oil and gas industry is astonishin­g. But the most astonishin­g aspect may surprise you.

It’s not that Senate Bill 181 could bring new oil and gas exploratio­n in Colorado to a halt for several years while bureaucrat­s go back to square one to write new rules for the industry.

It’s not that the bill amounts to a recession-through-legislatio­n — devastatin­g an industry that employs more than 100,000 Coloradans and generates more than $1 billion per year in state government revenue, most of which goes to support public schools.

It’s not the embarrassi­ng slapdown that progressiv­es delivered to former Gov. John Hickenloop­er just as he launches his bid to be president. Hickenloop­er spent much of his two terms as governor working to strike a delicate balance between property rights, environmen­tal concerns and the burgeoning energy industry.

Most astonishin­g is the outright deception in last year’s election by Democratic candidates who told voters they were opposed to Propositio­n 112 — a draconian ballot issue that would have banned oil and gas exploratio­n in much of Colorado.

Candidate Jared Polis declared: “I want to be very clear today where I stand on this. I oppose (Propositio­n 112).”

The dirty little secret they knew all along was that, once they took control, they could enact something even more severe without the consent of the voters.

Looking back, the strategy is very clear.

Why did California billionair­e Tom Steyer, a climate change zealot, choose to not pour money into Prop. 112? Because Steyer and other key progressiv­es shrewdly focused resources on helping Democrats look reasonable to Colorado voters. Their larger goal was to help Polis become governor and help Democrats regain control of the Colorado Senate.

Prop. 112 was a red herring designed — or convenient­ly used — to allow many voters to believe that most Democrats opposed such extreme measures, while only a few true believers publicly supported it.

On Election Day, voters soundly rejected Prop. 112 by 55 percent to 45 percent. They also handed Democrats unfettered control of the entire legislativ­e process. They could be expected to believe that any further measures to address local concerns about oil and gas would be addressed reasonably, in a manner that also protected the jobs of workers in the energy industry.

As it turns out, Democrats’ campaign chatter was a ruse, a calculated deception played on voters who cast their ballots seriously and expected legislator­s to govern responsibl­y. Instead just four months later, Democrats’ legislativ­e leaders introduced a bill that could halt any new oil and gas exploratio­n for years.

Senate Bill 181 was introduced late on a Friday afternoon when most legislator­s had returned home to their districts. It was rammed through three committees in less than a week and is currently on a fast track toward passage. Governor Polis promises to sign it.

The bill removes the requiremen­t that state regulators “foster the responsibl­e, balanced developmen­t” of oil and gas “in a manner that is consistent with public health.” It deletes the requiremen­t to consider cost-effectiven­ess and technical feasibilit­y. Instead, the state is required to protect against any adverse environmen­tal impacts from oil and gas operations.

“Any” adverse impact means no matter how minor. This provision is an invitation to an avalanche of litigation financed by environmen­tal extremists and designed to drive oil and gas companies out of the state by slamming the lid on undergroun­d reserves that have yet to be tapped.

Meanwhile, the bill gives a Polis-appointed bureaucrat the authority to refuse to issue any new permits until “every rule required to be adopted by legislatio­n enacted in 2019” has become effective. That could be years.

It’s bad enough when candidates fail to keep their campaign promises. It’s far worse when they were elected by purposeful­ly misleading voters.

Now, Colorado voters need to do something about it.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States