The Denver Post

Democrats declare it “imperative” to make the special counsel’s full report public.

- By Ellen Nakashima, Karoun Demirjian and Rachael Bade

WASHINGTON» House Democrats, concerned that President Donald Trump’s attorney general may withhold evidence of wrongdoing uncovered by special counsel Robert Mueller, are preparing for potential battle over access to the full contents of Mueller’s newly completed report, vowing to pursue it and any underlying investigat­ive materials in court if necessary.

“We will fight” for the full report, said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, emphasizin­g that Democrats expect complete transparen­cy from Mueller and the Justice Department, save for redactions of classified informatio­n that could jeopardize sensitive law enforcemen­t methods if disclosed publicly.

Attorney General William Barr informed the heads of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees in a letter Friday that he might be able to advise them of Mueller’s “principal conclusion­s as soon as this weekend.” He noted also that neither Barr nor his predecesso­rs had challenged any actions Mueller took during his probe.

But with limited power to compel informatio­n from potential witnesses, congressio­nal Democrats are looking to Mueller’s findings to inform their investigat­ions of Trump’s campaign, businesses and alleged foreign ties — and insist they will be satisfied with nothing short of a complete account of the results and the evidence that informed them.

“The special counsel’s investigat­ion focused on questions that go to the integrity of our democracy itself: whether foreign powers corruptly interfered in our elections and whether unlawful means were used to hinder that investigat­ion,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, DCalif., and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a joint statement after Barr announced Mueller had completed his report. “The American people have a right to the truth. The watchword is transparen­cy.”

The stakes are high: If the special counsel found evidence that Trump committed a crime, participat­ed in a coverup or otherwise engaged in conduct underminin­g the public trust, it could fuel calls for impeachmen­t, which Democratic leaders have resisted absent proof of wrongdoing.

According to the Justice Department, Mueller has not recommende­d any further indictment­s — news that Trump’s defenders in the GOP took as vindicatio­n. “The reports that there will be no new indictment­s confirm what we’ve known all along: there was never any collusion with Russia,” Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the House’s second-ranking Republican, said in a statement.

Trump’s disdain for Mueller’s probe, which he has labeled a “witch hunt,” and his animus toward congressio­nal oversight, which he considers “presidenti­al harassment,” have fed Democrats’ suspicion that he might have something to hide and might attempt to force Barr to conceal any unsavory details from public view.

As a result, Pelosi and Schumer warned Friday it was “imperative” Barr publicize Mueller’s findings no later than the president was made aware of the report’s contents. “Attorney General Barr must not give President Trump, his lawyers or his staff any ‘sneak preview’ of Special Counsel Mueller’s findings or evidence,” they said. “The White House must not be allowed to interfere in decisions about what parts of those findings or evidence are made public.”

Republican­s say the full report should be released. But they have stopped short of echoing the Democrats’ concerns, expressing faith that Barr will be as transparen­t as possible — indicating they will defer to Barr, not fight him.

Regulation­s governing Mueller’s work, which centers on Russia’s interferen­ce in the 2016 presidenti­al election and whether anyone in the Trump campaign conspired with those efforts, require the special counsel only to provide Barr with a confidenti­al report explaining why he elected to prosecute certain individual­s or declined to do so. Barr may release the report publicly, if he deems it “in the public interest.” That is not required, although he is under considerab­le pressure to do so.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States