The Denver Post

Barr, Mueller trade barbs

- By Eric Tucker and Mary Clare Jalonick

WASHINGTON» Private tensions between Justice Department leaders and special counsel Robert Mueller’s team broke into public view in extraordin­ary fashion Wednesday as Attorney General William Barr pushed back at the special counsel’s “snitty” complaints over his handling of the Trump-Russia investigat­ion report.

Testifying for the first time since releasing Mueller’s report, Barr faced sharp questionin­g from Senate Democrats who accused him of making misleading comments and seeming at times to be President Donald Trump’s protector as much as the country’s top law enforcemen­t official.

The rift fueled allegation­s that Barr has spun Mueller’s findings in Trump’s favor and understate­d the gravity of Trump’s behavior. The dispute is certain to persist, as Democrats push to give Mueller a chance to answer Barr’s testimony with his own later this month.

Barr separately informed the House Judiciary Committee that he would not appear for its scheduled hearing Thursday because of the panel’s insistence that he be questioned by committee lawyers as well as lawmakers.

That refusal sets the stage for Barr to possibly be held in contempt of Congress.

At Wednesday’s Senate Judicia

Committee session, Barr said he had been surprised Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, and that he had felt compelled to step in with his own judgment that the president had committed no crime.

“I’m not really sure of his reasoning,” Barr said of Mueller’s obstructio­n analysis, which neither accused the president of a crime nor exonerated him. If Mueller felt that shouldn’t make a decision on whether to bring charges, Barr added, “then he shouldn’t have investigat­ed. That was the time to pull up.”

Barr was also perturbed by a private letter Mueller, a longtime friend, sent him last month complainin­g that the attorney general had not properly portrayed the special counsel’s findings in a four-page letter summarizin­g the report’s main conclusion­s. The attorney general called the note “a bit snitty.”

“I said ‘Bob, what’s with the letter? Just pick up the phone and call me if there is an issue,’ ” Barr said.

The airing of disagreeme­nts was all the more striking because the Justice Department leadership and Mueller’s team had appeared unified in approach for most of the two-year investigat­ion into potential coordinati­on between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election.

The revelation that Mueller, who had been silent publicly for the entire investigat­ion, was agitated enough to send a letter to Barr — which could, and did, become public — lent his words extra credibilit­y with Democrats, who accused Barr of lying under oath last month when he denied that Mueller’s team was unhappy with how their work had been characteri­zed.

Barr downplayed the special counsel’s complaints, saying they were mostly about process, not substance, while raising a few objections of his own in the other direction. He said that Mueller did not, as requested, identify grand jury material in his report when he submitted it, slowing the public release of the report as the Justice Department worked to black out sensitive informatio­n.

“His concern was he wanted more out,” Barr said. He said Mueller did not say that Barr had inaccurate­ly characteri­zed the investigat­ion.

Barr also insisted that once Mueller submitted his report, his work was done and the document became “my baby.”

“It was my decision how and when to make it public,” Barr said. “Not Bob Mueller’s.”

Wednesday’s contentiou­s Senate hearing gave Barr his most extensive opportunit­y to date to defend recent Justice Department actions, including a news conference before the report’s release and his decision to release a brief summary letter two days after getting the report.

But the hearing, which included three Democratic presidenry tial candidates, also laid bare the partisan divide over the handling of Mueller’s report.

Some Republican­s, in addition to defending Trump, focused on the president’s 2016 Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton’s email and campaign practices and what they argued has been a lack of investigat­ion of them.

Television­s across the West Wing, including one just off the Oval Office used by the president, were tuned to cable coverage of Barr’s testimony. Trump told advisers he was pleased with Barr’s combative stance with Democratic senators, according to an administra­tion official and a Republican close to the White House who were not authorized to speak publicly about private discussion­s.

Trump tweeted Wednesday that the probe was “The greatest con-job in the history of American Politics!” He has told those around him that, after being disappoint­ed by former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, he has found an attorney general loyal to him.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States