The Denver Post

Restaurant­s may be first to get geneticall­y modified salmon

- By Candice Choi

N E W YORK» Inside an Indiana aquafarmin­g complex, thousands of salmon eggs geneticall­y modified to grow faster than normal are hatching into tiny fish. After growing to roughly 10 pounds in indoor tanks, they could be served in restaurant­s by late next year.

The salmon produced by Aquabounty are the first geneticall­y modified animals approved for human consumptio­n in the U.S. They represent one way companies are pushing to transform the plants and animals we eat, even as consumer advocacy groups call for greater caution.

Aquabounty hasn’t sold any fish in the U.S. yet, but it says its salmon may first turn up in places such as restaurant­s or university cafeterias, which would decide whether to tell diners that the fish are geneticall­y modified.

“It’s their customer, not ours,” said Sylvia Wulf, Aquabounty’s CEO.

To produce its fish, Aquabounty injected Atlantic salmon with DNA from other fish species that make them grow to full size in about 18 months, which could be about twice as fast as regular salmon. The company says that’s more efficient since less feed is required. The eggs were shipped to the U.S. from the company’s Canadian location last month after clearing final regulatory hurdles.

As Aquabounty worked through years of government approvals, several grocers, including Kroger and Whole Foods, responded to a campaign by consumer groups with a vow to not sell the fish.

Already, most corn and soy in the U.S. is geneticall­y modified to be more resistant to pests and herbicides. But as geneticall­y modified salmon make their way to dinner plates, the pace of change to the food supply could accelerate.

This month, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to simplify regulation­s for geneticall­y engineered plants and animals. The move comes as companies are turning to a newer gene-editing technology that makes it easier to tinker with plant and animal DNA.

That’s blurring the lines around what should be considered a geneticall­y modified organism, and how such foods are perceived. In 2015, an Associated Press-gfk poll found two-thirds of Americans supported labeling of geneticall­y modified ingredient­s on food packages. The following year, Congress directed regulators to establish national standards for disclosing the presence of bioenginee­red foods.

But foods made with the newer gene-editing technique wouldn’t necessaril­y be subject to the regulation, since companies say the resulting plants and animals could theoretica­lly be produced with convention­al breeding. And while Aquabounty’s salmon was produced with an older technique, it may not always be obvious when people are buying the fish either.

The disclosure regulation will start being implemente­d next year, but mandatory compliance doesn’t start until 2022. And under the rules, companies can provide the disclosure­s through codes people scan with their phones. The disclosure also would note that products have “bioenginee­red” ingredient­s, which advocacy groups say could be confusing.

“Nobody uses that term,” said Amy van Saun of the Center for Food Safety, who noted “geneticall­y engineered” or “geneticall­y modified” are more common.

The center is suing over the U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion’s approval of Aquabounty’s salmon, and it is among the groups that asked grocers to pledge they wouldn’t sell the fish.

The disclosure rules also do not apply to restaurant­s and similar food service establishm­ents. Greg Jaffe of the Center for Science in the Public Interest noted that Aquabounty’s fish will represent a tiny fraction of the U.S. salmon supply, and that many people may not care whether they’re eating geneticall­y modified food. Still, he said restaurant­s could make the informatio­n available to customers who ask about it.

“The informatio­n should not be hidden,” Jaffe said.

Aquabounty’s Wulf noted its salmon has already been sold in Canada, where disclosure is not required. She said the company believes in transparen­cy but questioned why people would want to know whether the fish are geneticall­y modified.

“It’s identical to Atlantic salmon, with the exception of one gene,” she said.

 ?? Photos by Michael Conroy, The Associated Press ?? Peter Bowyer, the facility manager at Aquabounty Technologi­es, points out a newly hatched Atlantic salmon alevin among the first batch of bioenginee­red eggs in an incubation tray in Albany, Ind., on June 19.
Photos by Michael Conroy, The Associated Press Peter Bowyer, the facility manager at Aquabounty Technologi­es, points out a newly hatched Atlantic salmon alevin among the first batch of bioenginee­red eggs in an incubation tray in Albany, Ind., on June 19.
 ??  ?? Bowyer holds one of the last batch of convention­al Atlantic salmon raised at the commercial fish farm in Albany, Ind.
Bowyer holds one of the last batch of convention­al Atlantic salmon raised at the commercial fish farm in Albany, Ind.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States