The Denver Post

Terror death boosts Trump

President touts triumph after U.S. forces cornered Islamic State chief

- By Jonathan Lemire

NEW YORK» The killing of Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi gave President Donald Trump an undeniable national security triumph and also a muchneeded political victory at the most precarious moment of his presidency.

Imperiled by an impeachmen­t inquiry and facing fierce foreign policy criticism from within his own party, Trump basked in the win Sunday, at first announcing the raid like so many of his predecesso­rs, with solemnity for the mission in Syria and praise for the brave Americans and allies who carried it out.

As the minutes passed, he reverted to the president who has tried to redefine the office and how Americans view it, using graphic language and awkward ad-libs while doling out swipes at his political foes, at home and abroad.

But despite the uniquely grandiose Trumpian flourishes, the president’s White House reveal of al-Baghdadi’s death gave him a destined-for-the-history-books image to place alongside Barack Obama’s iconic announceme­nt of the killing of Osama Bin Laden

and provided a potential bulwark to the rising tide of impeachmen­t and a ready-made line for this 2020 re-election campaign.

“The al-Baghdadi raid is a gold star for the Trump presidency. It was a lifeline to him because his poll numbers are tumbling and people think he’s made significan­t foreign policy mistakes in the Middle East,” said presidenti­al historian Douglas Brinkley of Rice University. “Just when he is massively hemorrhagi­ng, he is able to claim a foreign policy win. Impeachmen­t will swirl around him but this is concrete.”

The timing of the triumph appears ideal for Trump.

The president’s poll numbers had slipped amid the Democrats’ impeachmen­t inquiry into the request Trump made of Ukraine to investigat­e a political foe, leading to a parade of officials providing damaging testimony on Capitol Hill. Moreover, the raid comes amid a fusillade of criticism aimed at Trump’s recent decision to pull most U.S. troops out of Syria with some of the sharpest attacks coming from Senate Republican­s, usual allies who, were the president to be impeached by the Democratic-led House, would hold his fate in their hands.

“This allows him to say we can still succeed in Syria in light of all that has happened there in recent weeks because of his policy change,” said Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Haass cautioned that because of the slippery, shadowy nature of the Islamic State group, alBaghdadi’s death was “not a transforma­tional event” that would forever cripple the network. But he underscore­d that for the nation and for Trump, “It was a good day because it sends the message that no enemy of the United States is safe.”

In a national Sunday morning address, Trump described the daring nighttime airborne raid by American special operations forces in Syria’s northweste­rn Idlib province and said they flew over heavily militarize­d territory controlled by multiple nations and forces. No U.S. troops were killed in the operation, Trump said.

The death of al-Baghdadi was a milestone in the fight against the Islamic State, which brutalized swaths of Syria and Iraq and sought to direct a global campaign from a self-declared “caliphate.” A years-long campaign by American and allied forces led to the recapture of the group’s territoria­l holding, but its violent ideology has continued to inspire attacks.

Presidents are often measured by how they handle important national moments, the words they use becoming part of the permanent tableau of their time in office. When Trump hewed to his prepared remarks, he was in league with his predecesso­rs. But when he diverted, when a moment of national resolve and triumph turned into just another riffing questionan­d-answer session, he risked diminishin­g the moment.

As he so often does, Trump offered a commentary on the images that he had just watched, but this time he was not reacting to cable news talking heads, but rather video he viewed in the Situation Room as the raid was carried out, gloatingly narrating gruesome details about the militant leader’s death.

“He ignited his vest, killing himself and the three children. His body was mutilated by the blast,” said Trump, saying alBaghdadi fled into a “deadend” tunnel and detonated a suicide vest with U.S. troops cornering him. “The thug who tried so hard to intimidate others spent his last moments in utter fear, in total panic and dread, terrified of the American forces bearing down on him.”

And before long, the story was less about the raid and more about him. The targets of his grievances were familiar: Democrats, with whom he did not share informatio­n about the mission, as well as European nations, many of which have defied his wishes and disagreed with his policies. He also, once more, compared himself to his immediate predecesso­r and boasted what he had done was grander.

“Osama bin Laden was very big, but Osama bin Laden became big with the World Trade Center,” said Trump, before arguing that al-Baghdadi was a more lethal and important target. “This is a man who built a whole, as he would like to call it, a country, a caliphate, and was trying to do it again.”

The contrast with Obama’s 2011 announceme­nt about bin Laden’s death was striking. National celebratio­ns erupted over the death of the man who had killed nearly 3,000 on American soil. Al-Baghdadi, though extraordin­arily dangerous, had not orchestrat­ed an attack like the one bin Laden planned for Sept. 11, 2001, and was not nearly as well known.

And while Obama spoke somberly for nine minutes and took no questions, Trump held forth for 48 minutes, answering question after question and seemingly refused to let the moment wane. He called the slain militant “a total loser,” said he couldn’t trust Democrats not to leak details of the mission that would endanger American lives and complained about not getting enough credit for the success of his many books, including one which he falsely claimed was prescient about the dangers of bin Laden.

Furthering the victory lap, administra­tion officials fanned out on the Sunday talk shows and the White House released a photo of Trump watching the raid, again drawing contrasts, perhaps some unintentio­nal, with the bin Laden raid eight years earlier.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States