The Denver Post

If bill fails, advocates plan to put it on ballot

- By Saja Hindi

Advocates determined to provide family and medical leave to workers in Colorado — one way or another — started down the path this week to put it on the fall ballot if state lawmakers don’t pass it.

“Bad luck or a medical diagnosis shouldn’t leave anyone in financial ruin,” supporter Wendy Howell said in a statement.

A hearing is scheduled for Feb. 4 for two versions of a proposed initiative a group called Colorado Families First filed with the Legislativ­e Council on Tuesday.

A lead sponsor of the 2019 family leave bill that was eventually gutted welcomed the move as a “backup plan,” while business groups were swift to voice opposition.

Democratic lawmakers have vowed to pass a paid family leave program this year — their sixth attempt. Sen. Faith Winter of Westminste­r said she’s trying to satisfy a number of constituen­cies with very different ideas on how to implement it and is hopeful a bill will be ready for introducti­on by mid-February.

“I’m optimistic there’s a legislativ­e solution, but it’s always nice to have a backup plan,” she said.

Winter said she was not involved in crafting the proposed ballot measures.

The Colorado Chamber of Commerce said five legislativ­e sessions and an interim task force attempting to take on the issue show that it’s a complicate­d one. It’s important to balance the interests of businesses and employees, Loren Furman, senior vice president of state and federal relations, said in the statement.

“These ballot initiative­s, however, reflect the same stale

approach that has failed with the legislatur­e time and time again,” she said. “A payroll tax on every worker and business in the state will hurt the very people this policy is intended to help — especially small businesses and Coloradans living paycheck to paycheck.”

The Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce similarly opposed the measure.

“While we strongly support employers providing paid leave, a $2 billion tax increase to fund a state startup is the most inefficien­t, risky and ineffectiv­e way to do it,” president and CEO Kelly Brough said in a statement. “A state-run program that mandates a one-size-fits-all approach for our smallest businesses up to our largest corporatio­ns isn’t the answer.”

Brough said it’s “shocking” that the state is considerin­g taking on a new program when lawmakers haven’t delivered on issues of transporta­tion and education.

Colorado Families First expects to get a $500,000 contributi­on from the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a left-leaning lobbying and advocacy organizati­on that supports progressiv­e causes across the country.

If a measure is approved and moved to the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office, proponents will have to gather signatures to qualify for the November ballot.

Staff writer Alex Burness contribute­d to this report.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States