The Denver Post

Wolves’ return to Yellowston­e recalled on 25th anniversar­y

- By Michael Wright Ryan Berry, Bozeman Daily Chronicle

The day the wolves arrived in Yellowston­e National Park was busy. At least that’s how Norm Bishop remembers it.

The wolves came in aluminum crates on horse trailers on Jan. 12, 1995. Passing through the gates, the Canada-born carnivores were the first of their kind in the park in decades, other than the occasional rumor or random sighting.

Bishop, who was Yellowston­e’s resource interprete­r, had spent years giving public presentati­ons about the science of wolf reintroduc­tion. He would explain what the experts thought would happen if gray wolves were restored to the Yellowston­e ecosystem. How they weren’t likely to injure people or devastate the livestock industry or eat every single elk.

How they were a missing piece of the ecosystem, and how things might change if they returned.

Each time, he used that powerful two-letter word — “If wolves are reintroduc­ed …” — because there was no guarantee this day would come.

Then it did.

But there wasn’t time for him to consider the significan­ce. There was work to do.

“For me, it was just kind of busy,” Bishop said.

His day began early. He went to Crystal Bench, east of Tower Junction in the northern part of the park. One of the park’s three acclimatio­n pens was there. The wolves were to live in those pens until biologists believed they were ready for the wild.

After the truck convoy got through the park gate — where a crowd of wolf advocates, reporters and school children had gathered to watch — it headed east from Mammoth Hot Springs. Once it was close enough to the pen, it stopped and park staffers loaded six of the crates onto a mule-drawn sleigh. The sleigh carried the captive animals over the snow to Bishop and the others tasked with hauling the boxes to the pens.

It wasn’t easy — 100 pounds of wolf inside 100 or more pounds of metal. Four people per crate. They were as quiet as possible. So were the wolves, Bishop remembered, unaware of the fanfare of their journey.

He helped carry the second crate, which held the alpha male of what would become known as the Crystal Creek pack. Photos from that day mostly focused on the first crate — a good photo op for Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, who shared the load with Yellowston­e Superinten­dent Michael Finley and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Mollie Beattie.

In some of the images, Bishop can point to a glove or leg that belongs to him. But there’s one where he’s unmistakab­le. It hangs on the wall in his office. It shows him whispering in Babbitt’s ear, telling the secretary where the crate carrying the alpha female should go.

For a long time, wolves were viewed as a nuisance. Something to be killed, not preserved. People viewed them and other predators as dire threats to livestock and the wildlife species people liked better — such as deer and elk.

The effort to get rid of wolves was successful in the Yellowston­e region. While a small population held on in northwest Montana and Canadian wolves did OK, they were extirpated from the greater Yellowston­e ecosystem. The last known pack was killed in 1926, though sightings of single wolves were occasional­ly reported after that.

Looking back on that era now, biologists and conservati­onists would view the park as incomplete. Bishop described it as a Bach concerto without the trumpets.

The crates being dropped off 25 years ago were the beginning of the return of the trumpets.

Biologists and conservati­onists have seen it as a great success.

“It truly was and is a rebirth and recalibrat­ing of what is the essence of Yellowston­e,” said Finley, the former superinten­dent.

Doug Smith, the park’s top wolf biologist, was hired for the re-introducti­on and has spent the last 2½ decades watching what came next.

He’s seen wolf numbers ebb and flow. The population peaked in 2004 at 174, but it’s since declined and stabilized. He said it has hovered around 100 in 10 packs since about 2008.

He’s seen the dire prediction­s propagated by opponents of reintroduc­tion fall by the wayside.

He’s seen the ecological changes the wolves brought. Most prominent is the decline in elk. The population in the park’s northern range has dropped from roughly 20,000 to between 6,000 and 8,000.

Smith and other biologists say that 20,000 elk was too many and that the park is healthier now. The park’s vegetation has benefited. Aspen and willows can grow taller without so much pressure from elk browsing for nutrition.

“Yellowston­e is a better place with a fully intact carnivore guild,” Smith said.

Getting to that version of Yellowston­e required about 20 years of preparatio­n in the face of fierce opposition from people who thought the world was better without wolves.

John Varley, who was Yellowston­e’s chief scientist through the 1980s and 1990s, oversaw much of that work. Because it was so controvers­ial, he knew the park needed to take the time to explain how this could work without the sky falling. Some could never be convinced, but the case had to be made. “You’ve got to get the public ready for this,” Varley said. “So that’s what we did.”

Bishop was a key player in that effort. As the park’s resource interprete­r, his job was to explain science to people, to translate the intricacie­s of an immensely complex place. Wolves became a big part of his job, and he learned all he could about them. He wound up giving about 400 presentati­ons around the country, making the case for bringing back the carnivore. “He had kind of a road show,” Varley said.

 ??  ?? Norm Bishop, 87, relaxes at his home near Bozeman, Mont., with a photo and award from his years of working with wolves. Bishop, who was Yellowston­e’s resource interprete­r, spent years giving public presentati­ons about the science of wolf reintroduc­tion.
Norm Bishop, 87, relaxes at his home near Bozeman, Mont., with a photo and award from his years of working with wolves. Bishop, who was Yellowston­e’s resource interprete­r, spent years giving public presentati­ons about the science of wolf reintroduc­tion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States