The Denver Post

Should racial and ethnic slurs count in Scrabble?

- By David Waldstein

Josephine Flowers became a ranked, competitiv­e Scrabble player more than a dozen years ago, and to commemorat­e the moment, she inscribed her custom-built game board with one of her favorite sayings: “Never underestim­ate the power of words.”

The phrase serves as a constant reminder to her that, even when people say that the words formed on a Scrabble board are supposedly divorced of meaning, they can still inflict pain.

That is why Flowers, who is Black, and several other members of the North American Scrabble Players Associatio­n, have called on the organizati­on to ban the use of an anti-black racial slur, and as many as 225 other offensive terms, from its lexicon.

“You could be sitting there for a 45-minute game just looking at that word,” said Flowers, a mental health worker from West Memphis, Ark. “And if you don’t know the person who played it, then you wonder, was it put down as a slight, or was it the first word that came to their mind?”

The issue may never come up again. Hasbro, which owns the rights to Scrabble in North America, said Tuesday the players associatio­n had “agreed to remove all slurs from their word list for Scrabble tournament play, which is managed solely by NASPA and available only to members.”

John Chew, the chief executive of the associatio­n, seemed to agree. He had asked the organizati­on’s 12-person advisory board to vote on the matter in the coming days, but the statement from Hasbro was presented as a fait accompli, which could rankle those who oppose expurgatin­g any words from the lexicon.

“It is the right thing to do,” Chew said Tuesday night.

Julie Duffy, a spokeswoma­n for Hasbro, said the company will amend Scrabble’s official rules “to make it clear that slurs are not permissibl­e in any form of the game.”

The game that Hasbro sells in retail stores has not included slurs in its dictionary since 1994. But the players associatio­n, one of the most prominent governing bodies in competitiv­e Scrabble, had still allowed them. The agreement could also affect which words may be played in online

versions of the game.

Scrabble tournament­s had previously allowed slurs on the basis that, however egregious, they are part of the English language. The guiding principle for players has been that points — not messaging or tact — win games.

But now, as people in the United States and many parts of the world campaign against systemic racism after George Floyd’s killing in Minneapoli­s police custody, a wide range of previously untouchabl­e monuments, team names and, now, the rules of a board game, are under scrutiny.

Chew, the son of a Japanese mother and a father of English ancestry, formally petitioned the organizati­on’s advisory board last month to remove some or all of the 226 words labeled offensive by the Merriamweb­ster dictionary, especially the racial slur that the dictionary says is “almost certainly” the most offensive in the English language.

“When people are dying in the streets over racial tensions and this word still has so much power,” Chew said in a telephone interview from his home in Toronto last week, “you have to tell yourself this is just a game we are playing and we have to do what we can to make things right, just in our little corner of the world.”

The debate over the use of slurs in Scrabble is not a new one. In the 1990s, the Anti-defamation League called on Hasbro to disallow the use of slurs after a complaint about an anti-semitic term, and Hasbro was happy to oblige.

It was the competitiv­e players who objected. In a compromise, slurs and profanitie­s were taken out of the official Scrabble Dictionary, but clubs and tournament­s could follow a separate lexicon, produced by the players’ associatio­n, that allows for the slurs.

“It is very difficult for a lot of people to understand why those words are still acceptable in Scrabble,” said Stefan Fatsis, the author of a book on competitiv­e scrabble, “Word Freak.”

But, he added, “for Scrabble players, they are just instrument­s with which to score points.”

For those who objected to removing the words, Chew said, the three main arguments were that a word’s meaning is irrelevant in Scrabble; it’s a slippery slope, and — one he repeated with a tone of incredulit­y — if some people are not offended by the presence of those words, why should anyone else be?

He also noted that some members had told him that, because he is not Black, this is not his fight. And there are Black players who oppose removing the offensive words.

“If I’m going to lose the game playing a different word, then I’m going to use that word,” said Noel Livermore, a Black competitiv­e player from Florida who opposes removing any words. “I need to score points. And on that board, they don’t have any meaning.”

Livermore, who began playing with friends as a teenager in his hometown, Kingston, Jamaica, has played in tournament­s around the world and calls Scrabble “a numbers game disguised as a word game.” When opponents have played a slur on the board against him, he does not even flinch, he said.

But he recalled once using an obscenity when playing against a woman.

“I apologized,” he said. “But I need the points. I’m not going to lose the game.”

John Mcwhorter, a professor of linguistic­s at Columbia University who is Black, said he felt Black players such as Livermore should be the ones to decide the matter. If not, he said, then the proposal is merely an exercise in a few white men “testifying to their goodness as anti-racists.”

The post that set off the debate was written by Jim Hughes, a top player from Austin, Texas. He said the organizati­on needed to show support for social and racial justice.

Hughes acknowledg­ed playing slurs in the past to collect points.

“But just because something has been acceptable for so long doesn’t mean it doesn’t hurt,” Hughes said.

Some of the most commonly used slurs in Scrabble are actually three-letter words, popular not for the sting they inflict, but for their ability to slip into small crevices on the board and rack up big scores. Flowers said she has played one such small word regularly without understand­ing the meaning. She also used an anti-semitic word in a national tournament years ago, and she said she regretted it.

That is why she advocates banning any word that a group considers offensive.

“I’m surprised it’s even a question,” she said. “Where are the hearts and the thoughts of the people who want to keep these words? Why are they so attached to offensive words when there are so many other words to play and enjoy.”

 ?? Angela Rowlings, Boston Herald ?? Inmates play Scrabble at the Middlesex House of Correction and Jail last year in Billerica, Mass.
Angela Rowlings, Boston Herald Inmates play Scrabble at the Middlesex House of Correction and Jail last year in Billerica, Mass.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States