The Denver Post

More Coloradans weigh online school

Worried parents say the COVID-19 risks of in-class learning are too great in coming year

- By Tiney Ricciardi

When growing concerns about the spread of the coronaviru­s triggered the abrupt shuttering of Colorado schools in March, families and faculty members were forced to finish the academic year from the confines of their homes.

For many the transition wasn’t easy. Parents had to double as caretakers and teachers, while students tried to adapt to a revolving door of online classroom solutions. Educators needed to find new ways to engage with students practicall­y overnight, as districts doled out laptops and internet hotspots to ensure families had the technology to connect virtually.

It was a massive adjustment, parents said, compounded by the stress of Gov. Jared Polis’ statewide stay-at-home order, which moved living, working and schooling under the same roof.

But that unusual end to the spring semester afforded students and parents a trial run in remote education. As districts across the state unveil plans to reopen schools, more Coloradans are considerin­g foregoing traditiona­l education and instead enrolling in online academic programs. The risks associated with

sending kids back to school for inperson instructio­n are too great, parents said, even with new mask, physical distancing and sanitation protocols.

“I don’t understand how our district believes they can put the safety protocols in place to protect the student body as a mass in a full return to school,” said Arvada resident Greg Nidy, who has an incoming fourth-grader, Jackson, and third-grader, Paisley, in Jeffco Public Schools. “Absent a guarantee by the district that there are legitimate protocols in place to ensure the security of my children, we would be 95% likely to do a remote learning environmen­t.”

Mounting parental concerns

Since the spring semester ended, leaders of Colorado school districts have been devising plans for a return to school in the fall. Many first proposed a blended format, with some in-person classes supplement­ed by remote learning, to reduce the number of kids in classrooms and accommodat­e social distancing.

But a newly released report from Metro Denver Partnershi­p for Health recommende­d schools fully reopen using risk-reduction strategies said to mitigate the spread of the novel coronaviru­s. While there’s certainly the possibilit­y of a COVID-19 outbreak in a school, the report’s authors said children are not the primary drivers of disease transmissi­on and that keeping facilities closed does more harm than good for their social and emotional well-being.

That prompted some districts — including Denver Public Schools, the state’s largest, and Jeffco Public Schools — to pivot to hosting in-person instructio­n five days a week for all students this fall, with the option to choose full-time online education. At the same time, rates of infection among younger Coloradans are rising as overall COVID-19 cases and hospitaliz­ations are increasing across the state.

Leaders are confident they can reopen schools safely by screening the temperatur­es of students and staff members upon arrival each day, marking one-way hallways, cohorting students into groups that stay together throughout the day, designatin­g specific facility entrances and exits, staggering arrival and dismissal times and adhering to other guidance from health experts. Some districts, including DPS, will require students and teachers to wear masks.

Still, returning to the classroom doesn’t sit well with Colorado Springs resident Melissa Whitworth-mathes, whose 16-year-old son, William, has asthma. As site coordinato­r for Children’s Literacy Center, which offers one-onone tutoring, Whitworth-mathes has seen how interactiv­e children are in an educationa­l setting. She doesn’t believe teachers will be able to enforce mask-wearing and other safety measures.

After years of homeschool­ing, Whitworth-mathes hoped to send William and her 11-year-old daughter, Meredith, to public school. But she decided to wait another year.

“Everyone’s just sort of assuming everybody’s going to be on their best behavior and everything’s going to work out,” she said. “Online school really does seem to be the only option we have to choose right now.”

Paskoff of Arvada agrees. While she’d prefer to send her son, Hayes, back to school at Van Arsdale Elementary, she has reservatio­ns. Paskoff works as the sole occupation­al therapist at a local charter school, which requires her to mingle between grades and classrooms to reach all her students. She hopes she and Hayes can leverage remote education this fall.

“Going back to school and putting groups of people, even if they’re small groups, inside enclosed classrooms seems like a very bad idea to me,” Paskoff said. “It just seems like there’s some denial of what the results could be.”

Colorado’s online learning landscape

Online education is nothing new in Colorado, which boasts more than 60 accredited programs, according to the state Department of Education. Some are associated exclusivel­y with brick-and-mortar school districts, such as the St. Vrain Online Global Academy and the Westminste­r Virtual Academy. Others, such as Colorado Connection­s Academy, accept students throughout the state.

All public online schools are free for residents, although they vary in format and focus, said Tillie Elvrum, board president of the Colorado Coalition for Cyberschoo­l Families, which advocates for virtual schooling. Some adhere to a general education curriculum, much like their brick-and-mortar counterpar­ts, while others enable students to specialize in a trade or accrue college credits.

During the 2018-19 school year, there were 21,246 Colorado kids enrolled in online education programs — a 31% increase over five years prior, the state education department reported. Although that represents a small portion of Colorado students — about 2.5% of the overall K-12 public school population — experts say interest is growing. This year, it’s due in no small part to uncertaint­y surroundin­g the pandemic.

Jeffco Public Schools Superinten­dent Jason Glass expects 10% to 20% of the student body, or 8,000 to 15,000 students, will opt for the district’s online option in lieu of returning physically to school. In previous years, only about 1% of Jeffco’s students enrolled in the virtual program.

Colorado Connection­s Academy served about 2,800 remote students during the 2019-20 school year, said executive director Chaille Hymes. Applicatio­ns for the coming year are up 30% and the school expects to enroll 3,500 students in the fall.

“There’s a lot families who are wanting consistenc­y. They felt very upended this year, and it was very chaotic,” Hymes said. “By applying for our school and coming to us next year, they at least know they’ll have consistenc­y throughout the year.”

Stability is perhaps one of the biggest benefits to online schooling in light of the coronaviru­s. When schools shut down in March, students and faculty members in virtual programs were not affected because they already had systems in place for working remotely. Some, such as Branson School Online, were instrument­al in helping the rest of their district in southeaste­rn Colorado adapt, said principal Leanna Christians.

“We were on spring break when (the pandemic) hit. Then when we came back, it was business as usual,” Christians said. “All field trips for spring got canceled because we couldn’t go anywhere. But day-today classwork, nothing changed.”

Proponents say the remote learning environmen­t allows students to customize their education. Advanced learners can move more quickly through lessons or dig deeper into subjects and challenge themselves individual­ly. Students can also move at a slower pace if they’re struggling with a subject or concept.

“That, to me, is huge. I worked in a brick-and-mortar school. I know the kid who got held back or the kid who had to go out for extra time to meet with a special teacher. All of those stigmas are gone,” Christians said.

Advocates maintain there’s a misconcept­ion that virtual learning is less challengin­g academical­ly than in-person school. Hymes at Colorado Connection­s Academy said students complete six hours of “pretty rigorous curriculum” each day that includes core classes, electives such as art, sign language and physical education, as well as supplement­al labs.

Paskoff’s son, Hayes, thrived in his virtual Jeffco classes this spring because he wasn’t distracted by his peers or other aspects of the classroom. Nidy’s kids also had a great remote experience, thanks to the dedication and communicat­ion of Jeffco’s teachers, he said.

The challenges of online learning

But the remote format isn’t a fit for every family. It requires an immense amount of self-discipline and commitment, and parental support is also important for success, Christians said.

“There’s no bell that rings that tells you to go to class. There’s no bus that comes and delivers you to the door. You have to be responsibl­e for your timing,” she said. “For a lot of kids, it’s a big, big, big learning curve.”

An April survey conducted by the state Department of Education and the Colorado Education Initiative showed that some Coloradans found it tough to adjust to online learning. Of the 500 parents surveyed, 35% said their children did not participat­e in any remote learning after schools shut down in March.

Many also do not have the option to consider a virtual approach. An estimated 52,918 students statewide do not have access to a Wifienable­d device, the survey said, and an estimated 65,860 do not have internet at home. Those figtracy ures do not include students who may have inadequate or slow internet access.

For Meg Conley and her 8-yearold daughter, Viola, remote learning in the spring was “a catastroph­e.” Viola, who has dyslexia, felt disconnect­ed and overwhelme­d by the transition to virtual classes, Conley said.

Conley has been homeschool­ing Viola and her 11-year-old sister, Margaret, to make up for lost ground at the end of the semester. Each morning, they unpack a basket filled with the day’s lessons, including poetry, world history and crafts. It usually takes an hour-anda-half to three hours to complete.

It’s also practice for Conley, who said she’d consider homeschool­ing the girls full time if Denver Public Schools is forced to go remote again.

“There’s a reason we don’t do remote learning with kids this age in general, but especially kids with learning difference­s,” Conley said. “It took a toll on both girls’ mental and emotional health.”

When kids learn remotely, they often miss out on socializin­g with their peers and building community — things that concerned all parents interviewe­d for this story. Many online programs have inperson field trips and networking opportunit­ies for families, but because of the pandemic, those activities have been suspended.

That’s why Iliana Rentería believes many parents embrace a hybrid learning model. A New Castle resident and mom of two, Rentería works with many Latino families through her job at Raising a Reader Aspen to Parachute, a nonprofit organizati­on dedicated to fostering literacy.

When she recently polled parents on Facebook, most preferred a mix of online and in-person classes. Many parents found remote learning difficult to implement and thought their children were not learning as well, she said. But they are also cautious of COVID-19.

“They would rather have a teacher that is coaching (kids) and telling them what to do,” Rentería said. “And maybe come to school once a week or twice a week and have some socializat­ion in there, like some sense of normalcy.”

The second-most-popular option was an online curriculum, she added. That’s the one she’s most seriously considerin­g for her 13year-old daughter, Annette, and 8year-old son, Leonardo.

Whether the coronaviru­s pandemic inspires a cultural shift toward online learning remains to be seen. But at the very least, parents now know they have additional tools to support their children’s education, Elvrum said — even if they only use them for a year or two.

For many, it’s not only about academics, but also peace of mind.

“Online education proves inperson instructio­n is not required for education to happen,” Whitsworth-mathes said. No matter how the pandemic evolves this fall, her kids will be secure knowing they have a plan for education.

“It’s one less thing they have to think or worry about.”

 ?? Rachel Ellis, The Denver Post ?? Brittany Nidy blows bubbles Thursday for her daughters, Cora, 3, and Paisley, 7, at their home in Arvada. The family is likely to do online learning this upcoming school year.
Rachel Ellis, The Denver Post Brittany Nidy blows bubbles Thursday for her daughters, Cora, 3, and Paisley, 7, at their home in Arvada. The family is likely to do online learning this upcoming school year.
 ?? Helen H. Richardson, The Denver Post ?? Chris Paskoff and his wife, Tracy, work on a science project with their son, Hayes, 6, in their backyard on July 1 in Arvada.
Helen H. Richardson, The Denver Post Chris Paskoff and his wife, Tracy, work on a science project with their son, Hayes, 6, in their backyard on July 1 in Arvada.
 ?? Rachel Ellis, The Denver Post ?? Greg Nidy kisses his 3-year-old daughter, Cora, on the forehead after coming back to the family’s home in Arvada from a lunch meeting. “I don’t understand how our district believes they can put the safety protocols in place to protect the student body as a mass in a full return to school,” he said.
Rachel Ellis, The Denver Post Greg Nidy kisses his 3-year-old daughter, Cora, on the forehead after coming back to the family’s home in Arvada from a lunch meeting. “I don’t understand how our district believes they can put the safety protocols in place to protect the student body as a mass in a full return to school,” he said.
 ?? Helen H. Richardson, The Denver Post ?? Hayes Paskoff, 6, plays on a rope ladder July 1 in the backyard of his family’s Arvada home. His mother said Hayes thrived during the spring semester — when school classes were forced to be completed remotely because of the coronaviru­s — because he was not distracted by the classroom setting or his peers.
Helen H. Richardson, The Denver Post Hayes Paskoff, 6, plays on a rope ladder July 1 in the backyard of his family’s Arvada home. His mother said Hayes thrived during the spring semester — when school classes were forced to be completed remotely because of the coronaviru­s — because he was not distracted by the classroom setting or his peers.
 ?? Rachel Ellis, The Denver Post ?? The Nidy family plays in the front yard of their Arvada home. Brittany and Greg Nidy are not sure if Jefferson County’s plan to return to in-school learning is the best choice for their children.
Rachel Ellis, The Denver Post The Nidy family plays in the front yard of their Arvada home. Brittany and Greg Nidy are not sure if Jefferson County’s plan to return to in-school learning is the best choice for their children.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States