The Denver Post

How do you value and define rosé?

- By Eric Asimov

Certain categories of wine must be approached on tiptoe, as opinions surroundin­g them will be tenaciousl­y defended, even if their champions are illinforme­d. Arguments will ensue.

Riesling is like that, for sure, and natural wine, without a doubt. But rosé?

Rosé is a popular, beloved sort of wine, I imagined, that all would embrace. It’s for lovers, not for fighters, connoting relaxation, not combat.

Yet as we explored an assortment of rosés in our latest unit of Wine School, I was surprised to find substantia­l disagreeme­nts not only on how these wines were experience­d — that’s always a given — but also on the nature of rosé, how to define it and whether it has any value at all.

Informed debate and discussion is the purpose of Wine School. Our aim is to promote exploratio­n and understand­ing, as well as comfort and ease with wine. Achieving these goals, however, requires actually drinking the wines and forming opinions based on your impression­s.

You can never be wrong in describing how a wine makes you feel. That is a matter of taste, informed by experience. Our belief is that with increased knowledge, by which I mean trying many different sorts of wines, opinions may evolve. When it comes to wine, being open-minded means extra pleasure.

As usual, I recommende­d three bottles. They were: Wölffer Estate Long Island Rosé 2019, Tiberio Cerasuolo d’Abruzzo 2019 and Arnot-Roberts California Rosé Touriga Nacional 2019.

The idea was to look at different ideas of rosé, from different places, made from different grapes, using different techniques. “My feeling is that classifica­tion as red, white or rosé is so 19th century,” Elizabeth Gabay, an English wine authority, wrote in the same Twitter thread. She suggested relying on vinificati­on technique rather than color.

By that standard, are these three entirely different wines? If you try them all, it seems so.

The Arnot-Roberts, from California, was the most convention­al rosé, even if its components, 80% touriga nacional and 20% tinta cão, both leading port grapes, are unusual choices for rosé.

After harvest, the grapes were crushed and the juice was left to macerate with the pigment-laden skins until the desired color was achieved, about 24 hours. The wine was fermented, but malolactic fermentati­on, in which bacteria transform malic acid into softer lactic acid, was blocked in order to maintain liveliness. It was aged briefly in steel vats.

The result was a superb pale rosé, fresh and energetic, with complex fruit, floral and herbal flavors and a chalky minerality.

The Wölffer, from the South Fork of Long Island, was made differentl­y. It was roughly 60% merlot, 33% chardonnay and 6% cabernet franc, with small amounts of a few other grapes. It’s quite rare for good rosés, other than sparkling wines, to be made from a blend of red and white grapes.

The Wölffer winemaker, Roman Roth, told me that the merlot is harvested with plenty of color in the juice and does not require maceration with the skins. The chardonnay, he said, lightens the color of the merlot and adds texture. He, too, blocks the malolactic fermentati­on — a step, he said, that has become more important with climate change.

The wine, which had a pale salmon color like the ArnotRober­ts, was dry, lively and well rounded, with floral, peachy flavors. This is a fun wine, not as complex as the Arnot-Roberts, but just what you might want poolside or at other casual summer gatherings.

The Tiberio Cerasuolo d’Abruzzo is different. This dark style, made entirely from the montepulci­ano grape, is traditiona­l in the Abruzzo region. Like the Arnot-Roberts, the juice is macerated with the skins until it achieves the desired cherry red color. As with the other two, the malolactic fermentati­on is blocked.

The wine is fresh and lively, energetic and dry, with tangy, stony, floral flavors and a touch of salinity. It has complexity and character, and is simply lovely. While the other two might go best with relatively delicate dishes, this is definitely a food wine and would go well with a wide range, including lamb, as Martina Mirandola Mullen of New York suggested.

Paradoxica­lly, grouping these wines by vinificati­on technique, as Gabay suggested, would put the Arnot-Roberts and the Tiberio together. These two very different-looking and -tasting wines both achieved their colors through maceration.

The Wölffer, which resembled the Arnot-Roberts, would be in a separate category. For now, I’ll stick to calling them all rosés.

 ?? Pepe Serra, © The New York Times Co. ?? Very different bottles of rosé raised questions about whether to group by color or by how the wines are made.
Pepe Serra, © The New York Times Co. Very different bottles of rosé raised questions about whether to group by color or by how the wines are made.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States